A foreign issuer's stablecoin may be traded here only if it can obey a lawful order
What the document says“A payment stablecoin that is issued by a foreign payment stablecoin issuer may not be publicly offered, sold, or otherwise made available for trading in the United States by a digital asset service provider unless the foreign payment stablecoin issuer has the technological capability to comply and complies with the terms of any lawful order.”
Subsection (a)(1). The condition has two halves: the capability to comply, and actual compliance. Lawful order is defined in section 2(16). Section 3(b)(2) states a bar in similar terms, and section 4(a)(6)(B) sets the matching condition for a permitted payment stablecoin issuer.
What the document actually says“A payment stablecoin that is issued by a foreign payment stablecoin issuer may not be publicly offered, sold, or otherwise made available for trading in the United States by a digital asset service provider unless the foreign payment stablecoin issuer has the technological capability to comply and complies with the terms of any lawful order.”
A coin from a maker set up abroad may not be traded here. A digital coin firm may not offer it. The bar lifts only if the maker can obey a court order and does.
The order can tell a maker to freeze or destroy coins. Part 2 says what counts as one. The maker must have the tools and must use them.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.