No new inspection is required to add a substance in the same or a lower schedule
What the document says“``(2)(A) If a person is registered to conduct research with a controlled substance and applies for a registration, or for a modification of a registration, to conduct research with a second controlled substance that is in the same schedule as the first controlled substance, or is in a schedule with a higher numerical designation than the schedule of the first controlled substance, a new inspection by the Attorney General of the registered location is not required.”
A paragraph added at the end of section 302(f) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 822(f)). Where a registered researcher applies to add a second substance in the same schedule as the first, or in a schedule with a higher number, no new inspection of the registered location is required.
What the document actually says“``(2)(A) If a person is registered to conduct research with a controlled substance and applies for a registration, or for a modification of a registration, to conduct research with a second controlled substance that is in the same schedule as the first controlled substance, or is in a schedule with a higher numerical designation than the schedule of the first controlled substance, a new inspection by the Attorney General of the registered location is not required.”
A researcher is signed up for one drug. They ask to add a second drug on the same list or a lower one. The site does not have to be checked again.
Schedule I is the first list. A higher number means a later list. The rule saves a second check of the same place.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.