Read theMandate

Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025Section 2 › Proposal

A provision that reached one subsection is made to reach four

To clarify the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016, to appropriately limit the application of defenses based on the passage of time and other non-merits defenses to claims under that Act, section 2, Sec. 2. Written by .

A provision that reached one subsection is made to reach four

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 2 in the PDF
What the document says

“in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking "Subsection (a)" and inserting "Subsections (a), (b), (f), and (g)"”

To clarify the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016, to appropriately limit the application of defenses based on the passage of time and other non-merits defenses to claims under that Act, Sec. 2

A change to the matter preceding paragraph (1) of the subsection of section 5 of the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016 (22 U.S.C. 1621 note) now lettered (e). The words struck name one subsection, and the words put in name four: (a), (b), (f) and (g), which are the subsection that was already there and the three this section adds. What the rest of that subsection says is not stated in this law.

What the document actually says

“in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking "Subsection (a)" and inserting "Subsections (a), (b), (f), and (g)"”

To clarify the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016, to appropriately limit the application of defenses based on the passage of time and other non-merits defenses to claims under that Act, Sec. 2
That sentence, in plain words

The words struck named one lettered part. The words put in name four of them.

What this is about

A part of the old law points at other parts. The list of them just got longer.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →