One subsection of section 5 is struck and five are relettered
What the document says“in section 5-- (A) by striking subsection (g); (B) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (h) and (i), respectively; (C) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively”
Subsection (g) of section 5 of the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2016 (22 U.S.C. 1621 note) is removed, and five other subsections are moved to new letters: (e) and (f) become (h) and (i), and (b), (c) and (d) become (c), (d) and (e). That clears the letters (b), (f) and (g) for the new subsections this section inserts. A conforming change follows: in the subsection now lettered (d), a pointer to subsection (e) is struck and a pointer to subsection (h) put in its place, so that it still reaches the same text. This law does not state what the struck subsection (g) provided or what any of the moved subsections say.
What the document actually says“in section 5-- (A) by striking subsection (g); (B) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (h) and (i), respectively; (C) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d) as subsections (c), (d), and (e), respectively”
This part cuts one lettered part out of the old law. It moves other lettered parts to new letters.
Laws are split into lettered parts. To add new ones, the old ones shift. The letters change but most words stay.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.