A state may sue the Secretary of State over the visa requirement in section 243(d)
What the document says“The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the requirement to discontinue granting visas to citizens, subjects, nationals, and residents as described in subsection (d) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of State”
Subsection (c) of section 3 adds a new subsection (e) to section 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1253). It gives a state attorney general, or another authorized state officer, standing to sue the Secretary of State in a federal district court for injunctive relief, on an allegation that the requirement in subsection (d) of that section to discontinue granting visas was violated in a way that harms the state or its residents.
What the document actually says“The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the requirement to discontinue granting visas to citizens, subjects, nationals, and residents as described in subsection (d) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of State”
A state's top law officer may sue the Secretary of State. The claim is that visas kept going out when a rule said to stop.
A visa is a paper that lets a person come here. The Secretary of State runs that system. This suit is aimed at that office.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.