Data must be developed under other law and carry a notice saying so
What the document says“With respect to data developed and distributed under this Act, the Secretaries shall-- (1) develop the data in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and Tribal laws (including regulations); and (2) include a notice that any geospatial data are subject to applicable Federal, State, and Tribal laws (including regulations).”
For data developed and distributed under the Act, the Secretaries must develop it in accordance with applicable Federal, State and Tribal laws, including regulations, and must include a notice that any geospatial data are subject to those same laws.
What the document actually says“With respect to data developed and distributed under this Act, the Secretaries shall-- (1) develop the data in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and Tribal laws (including regulations); and (2) include a notice that any geospatial data are subject to applicable Federal, State, and Tribal laws (including regulations).”
The leaders must build the data under other laws. Those are federal, state and tribal laws. They must add a note saying the data falls under those laws.
The note goes out with the map data. It tells users that other laws apply. All three kinds of law are named.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.