A phrase is struck and replaced in two places
What the document says“by striking "chapter 31 33, or 35 of this title" and inserting "chapter 31, 33, or 35 of this title, or chapter 1606 of title 10"”
The remaining two conforming edits, in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) and in paragraph (2) of subsection (e), are worded identically and are recorded here once. The struck phrase and the inserted phrase differ in two ways: the inserted phrase carries a comma after 31, and it adds the reference to chapter 1606 of title 10.
What the document actually says“by striking "chapter 31 33, or 35 of this title" and inserting "chapter 31, 33, or 35 of this title, or chapter 1606 of title 10"”
This takes out some words and puts new words in their place. The new words add chapter 1606 of title 10.
The words taken out and the words put in are close. The new set has one more comma. It also names the new chapter. The law makes this same change in two spots.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.