Read theMandate

Documents › Executive orders › 14366

Executive Order 14366

Protecting American Investors From Foreign-Owned and Politically-Motivated Proxy Advisors

Signed December 11, 2025, printed at 90 FR 58503. 4 sections of substance, 1,275 words.

In plain English

This order is about proxy advisors. These firms tell big investors how to vote. It says two of them have too much sway. It asks the SEC to look at its rules.

Read it at the Federal Register →

Sec. 1. Purpose

Unbeknownst to many Americans, two foreign-owned proxy advisors, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. and Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC, play a significant role in shaping the policies and priorities of America's largest companies through the shareholder voting process. These firms, which control more than 90 percent of the proxy advisor market, advise their clients about how to vote the enormous numbers of shares their clients hold and manage on behalf of millions of Americans in mutual funds and exchange traded funds. Their clients' holdings often constitute a significant ownership stake in the United States' largest publicly traded companies, and their clients often follow the proxy advisors' advice. As a result, these proxy advisors wield enormous influence over corporate governance matters, including shareholder proposals, board composition, and executive compensation, as well as capital markets and the value of Americans' investments more generally, including 401(k)s, IRAs, and other retirement investment vehicles. These proxy advisors regularly use their substantial power to advance and prioritize radical politically-motivated agendas--like ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance''--even though investor returns should be the only priority. For example, these proxy advisors have supported shareholder proposals requiring American companies to conduct racial equity audits and significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and one continues to provide guidance based on the racial or ethnic diversity of corporate boards. Their practices also raise significant concerns about conflicts of interest and the quality of their recommendations, among other concerns. The United States must therefore increase oversight of and take action to restore public confidence in the proxy advisor industry, including by promoting accountability, transparency, and competition.

Unbeknownst to many Americans, two foreign-owned proxy advisors, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. and Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC, play a significant role in shaping the policies and priorities of America's largest companies through the shareholder voting process. These firms, which control more than 90 percent of the proxy advisor market, advise their clients about how to vote the enormous numbers of shares their clients hold and manage on behalf of millions of Americans in mutual funds and exchange traded funds. Their clients' holdings often constitute a significant ownership stake in the United States' largest publicly traded companies, and their clients often follow the proxy advisors' advice. As a result, these proxy advisors wield enormous influence over corporate governance matters, including shareholder proposals, board composition, and executive compensation, as well as capital markets and the value of Americans' investments more generally, including 401(k)s, IRAs, and other retirement investment vehicles. These proxy advisors regularly use their substantial power to advance and prioritize radical politically-motivated agendas--like ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance''--even though investor returns should be the only priority. For example, these proxy advisors have supported shareholder proposals requiring American companies to conduct racial equity audits and significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and one continues to provide guidance based on the racial or ethnic diversity of corporate boards. Their practices also raise significant concerns about conflicts of interest and the quality of their recommendations, among other concerns. The United States must therefore increase oversight of and take action to restore public confidence in the proxy advisor industry, including by promoting accountability, transparency, and competition.

In plain English

This states the case the order makes. It names two proxy advisers. Both are foreign owned. It says they shape how big firms are run. They advise clients how to vote shares. Those clients hold shares for millions of savers. It says the two hold over 90 percent of that market. It says clients often follow their advice.

Sec. 2. Protecting Investors from Politicized Advice

(a) The Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) shall review all rules, regulations, guidance, bulletins, and memoranda relating to proxy advisors. Consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), the SEC Chairman shall consider revising or rescinding those rules, regulations, guidance, bulletins, and memoranda that are inconsistent with the purpose of this order, especially to the extent that they implicate ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance'' policies. (b) Consistent with the APA, the SEC Chairman shall consider revising or rescinding all rules, regulations, guidance, bulletins, and memoranda relating to shareholder proposals, including Rule 14a-8 (17 CFR 240.14a-8), that are inconsistent with the purpose of this order. (c) The SEC Chairman shall: (i) enforce the Federal securities laws' anti-fraud provisions with respect to material misstatements or omissions contained in proxy advisors' proxy voting recommendations; (ii) assess whether to require proxy advisors whose activities fall within the scope of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-1 et [[Page 58504]] seq.) and the rules promulgated thereunder, to register as Registered Investment Advisers; (iii) consider requiring proxy advisors to provide increased transparency on their recommendations, methodology, and conflicts of interest, especially regarding ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance'' factors; (iv) analyze whether, and under what circumstances, a proxy advisor serves as a vehicle for investment advisers to coordinate and augment their voting decisions with respect to a company's securities and, through such coordination and augmentation, form a group for purposes of sections 13(d)(3) and 13(g)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.); and (v) direct SEC staff to examine whether the practice of Registered Investment Advisers engaging proxy advisors to advise on (and following the recommendations of such proxy advisors with respect to) non-pecuniary factors in investing, including, as appropriate, ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance'' factors, is inconsistent with their fiduciary duties.

(a) The Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) shall review all rules, regulations, guidance, bulletins, and memoranda relating to proxy advisors. Consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), the SEC Chairman shall consider revising or rescinding those rules, regulations, guidance, bulletins, and memoranda that are inconsistent with the purpose of this order, especially to the extent that they implicate ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance'' policies. (b) Consistent with the APA, the SEC Chairman shall consider revising or rescinding all rules, regulations, guidance, bulletins, and memoranda relating to shareholder proposals, including Rule 14a-8 (17 CFR 240.14a-8), that are inconsistent with the purpose of this order. (c) The SEC Chairman shall: (i) enforce the Federal securities laws' anti-fraud provisions with respect to material misstatements or omissions contained in proxy advisors' proxy voting recommendations; (ii) assess whether to require proxy advisors whose activities fall within the scope of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-1 et [[Page 58504]] seq.) and the rules promulgated thereunder, to register as Registered Investment Advisers; (iii) consider requiring proxy advisors to provide increased transparency on their recommendations, methodology, and conflicts of interest, especially regarding ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance'' factors; (iv) analyze whether, and under what circumstances, a proxy advisor serves as a vehicle for investment advisers to coordinate and augment their voting decisions with respect to a company's securities and, through such coordination and augmentation, form a group for purposes of sections 13(d)(3) and 13(g)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.); and (v) direct SEC staff to examine whether the practice of Registered Investment Advisers engaging proxy advisors to advise on (and following the recommendations of such proxy advisors with respect to) non-pecuniary factors in investing, including, as appropriate, ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance'' factors, is inconsistent with their fiduciary duties.

In plain English

This tells the markets regulator to act. Its chair must review all rules on proxy advisers. Guidance and memos count too. It must weigh changing them or dropping them. The test is whether they clash with this order. Rules that touch diversity aims are the named worry. So are rules on green and social aims. The rule on shareholder proposals is named as well.

Sec. 3. Unfair, Deceptive, or Anticompetitive Practices

(a) The Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), in consultation with the Attorney General, shall review ongoing State antitrust investigations into proxy advisors and determine if there is a probable link between conduct underlying those investigations and violations of Federal antitrust law. (b) The FTC Chairman, under the authorities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) and in consultation with the Attorney General, as appropriate, shall investigate whether proxy advisors engage in unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices that harm United States consumers by: (i) conspiring or colluding, explicitly or implicitly, to diminish the value of consumer investments (including pensions and retirement accounts); (ii) failing to adequately disclose conflicts of interest; (iii) providing misleading or inaccurate information; (iv) undermining the ability of consumers to make informed choices; or (v) otherwise engaging in conduct that violates the antitrust laws as defined in 15 U.S.C. 12(a) or section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45).

(a) The Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), in consultation with the Attorney General, shall review ongoing State antitrust investigations into proxy advisors and determine if there is a probable link between conduct underlying those investigations and violations of Federal antitrust law. (b) The FTC Chairman, under the authorities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) and in consultation with the Attorney General, as appropriate, shall investigate whether proxy advisors engage in unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices that harm United States consumers by: (i) conspiring or colluding, explicitly or implicitly, to diminish the value of consumer investments (including pensions and retirement accounts); (ii) failing to adequately disclose conflicts of interest; (iii) providing misleading or inaccurate information; (iv) undermining the ability of consumers to make informed choices; or (v) otherwise engaging in conduct that violates the antitrust laws as defined in 15 U.S.C. 12(a) or section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45).

In plain English

This tells the trade commission to act. Its chair must look at state probes of proxy advisers. Justice is consulted. It must see if federal law was likely broken too. It must then look for unfair or deceptive practice. Working together to cut the value of savings is one test. Pensions are named. Hidden conflicts are another test. So is bad advice.

Sec. 4. Protecting Pensions and Retirement Plans

(a) The Secretary of Labor shall, consistent with the APA, take steps to revise all regulations and guidance regarding the fiduciary status of individuals who manage, or, like proxy advisors, advise those who manage, the rights appurtenant to shares held by plans covered under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), including proxy votes and corporate engagement, consistent with the policy of this order. The Secretary of Labor shall consider whether these proposed revisions should include amendments to specify that any individual who has a relationship of trust and confidence with their client, including any proxy advisor, and who provides advice for a fee or other compensation, direct or indirect, with respect to the exercise of the rights appurtenant to shares held by ERISA plans, is an investment advice fiduciary under ERISA. (b) The Secretary of Labor shall take all appropriate action to strengthen the fiduciary standards of pension and retirement plans covered under ERISA. Such action shall include assessing whether proxy advisors act solely in the financial interests of plan participants and the extent to which any of their practices undermine the pecuniary value of the assets of ERISA plans. (c) The Secretary of Labor shall take all appropriate action to enhance transparency concerning the use of proxy advisors, particularly regarding [[Page 58505]] ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance'' investment practices.

(a) The Secretary of Labor shall, consistent with the APA, take steps to revise all regulations and guidance regarding the fiduciary status of individuals who manage, or, like proxy advisors, advise those who manage, the rights appurtenant to shares held by plans covered under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), including proxy votes and corporate engagement, consistent with the policy of this order. The Secretary of Labor shall consider whether these proposed revisions should include amendments to specify that any individual who has a relationship of trust and confidence with their client, including any proxy advisor, and who provides advice for a fee or other compensation, direct or indirect, with respect to the exercise of the rights appurtenant to shares held by ERISA plans, is an investment advice fiduciary under ERISA. (b) The Secretary of Labor shall take all appropriate action to strengthen the fiduciary standards of pension and retirement plans covered under ERISA. Such action shall include assessing whether proxy advisors act solely in the financial interests of plan participants and the extent to which any of their practices undermine the pecuniary value of the assets of ERISA plans. (c) The Secretary of Labor shall take all appropriate action to enhance transparency concerning the use of proxy advisors, particularly regarding [[Page 58505]] ``diversity, equity, and inclusion'' and ``environmental, social, and governance'' investment practices.

In plain English

This covers pensions. Labor must revise its rules on who counts as a fiduciary. That covers people who manage share rights in retirement plans. It covers advisers to those managers too. Proxy voting is included. So is talking with company boards. Labor must weigh saying that a paid adviser in a trusted role is a fiduciary.

Sec. 5. General Provisions

Every order carries this. It is not what the order does.

(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. (d) The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Labor. <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT> (Presidential Sig.) THE WHITE HOUSE, December 11, 2025. [FR Doc. 2025-23093 Filed 12-15-25; 11:15 am] Billing code 4510-FN-P </pre></body> </html>

(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. (d) The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Labor. <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT> (Presidential Sig.) THE WHITE HOUSE, December 11, 2025. [FR Doc. 2025-23093 Filed 12-15-25; 11:15 am] Billing code 4510-FN-P </pre></body> </html>

In plain English

This is the closing clause that nearly every order carries. It says the order does not change what the law already allows. It also says no one can sue to enforce it.

How to cite this
  1. The order itself

    Executive Order 14366, “Protecting American Investors From Foreign-Owned and Politically-Motivated Proxy Advisors,” signed December 11, 2025, 90 FR 58503 (December 16, 2025).
    https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/12/16/2025-23093/protecting-american-investors-from-foreign-owned-and-politically-motivated-proxy-advisors

  2. This page

    Executive Order 14366, quoted section by section. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/orders/eo-14366/ (retrieved October 8, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How This Order Is Quoted

Each section is quoted as the order prints it, under its own number and heading. Executive orders are United States government works and are not under copyright. Long sections are cut at a sentence and the whole order is a click away.