Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 10301 › Proposal

The effective reference price factor rises from 85 to 88 for the 2025 crop year

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 10301, Sec. 10301. Written by .

The effective reference price factor rises from 85 to 88 for the 2025 crop year

The document says “is amendedWho acts: Secretary of AgricultureHow: statuteSec. 10301 in the PDF
What the document says

“Section 1111(8)(B)(ii) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9011(8)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking "85" and inserting "beginning with the crop year 2025, 88".”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10301

The section strikes the number 85 in section 1111(8)(B)(ii) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9011(8)(B)(ii)) and inserts words setting the figure at 88 beginning with the crop year 2025. That older provision is not indexed here, so this record states the change and stops.

What the document actually says

“Section 1111(8)(B)(ii) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9011(8)(B)(ii)) is amended by striking "85" and inserting "beginning with the crop year 2025, 88".”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10301
That sentence, in plain words

The number 85 is taken out. The number 88 is put in. The change starts with the 2025 crop year.

What this is about

The figure is used to work out a price floor for a crop. A higher figure means a higher floor. The older law it sits in is not indexed here.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →