Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 10303 › Proposal

Crops under risk coverage are no longer barred from the supplemental option

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 10303, Sec. 10303. Written by .

Crops under risk coverage are no longer barred from the supplemental option

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 10303 in the PDF
What the document says

“is amended by striking "Crops for which the producer has elected under section 1116 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 to receive agriculture risk coverage and acres" and inserting "Acres".”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10303

The section amends section 508(c)(4)(C)(iv) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1508(c)(4)(C)(iv)) by striking the quoted words and inserting the single word Acres. That older provision is not indexed here, so this record states the change and stops.

What the document actually says

“is amended by striking "Crops for which the producer has elected under section 1116 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 to receive agriculture risk coverage and acres" and inserting "Acres".”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10303
That sentence, in plain words

A long phrase is taken out of an older law. One word is put in its place. That word is Acres.

What this is about

The phrase named crops under the risk cover program. Taking it out leaves only acres. What that means in the older law is not recorded here.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →