Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 10401 › Proposal

Fish farms losing stock to birds become eligible for payments

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 10401, Sec. 10401. Written by .

Fish farms losing stock to birds become eligible for payments

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of AgricultureHow: statuteSec. 10401 in the PDF
What the document says

“Eligible producers of farm-raised fish, including fish grown as food for human consumption, shall be eligible to receive payments under this subsection to aid in the reduction of losses due to piscivorous birds.”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10401

The section adds a new paragraph (5) to section 1501(d) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9081(d)) making producers of farm-raised fish eligible for payments to help cut losses to fish-eating birds. Farm-raised fish is defined as fish propagated and reared in a controlled fresh water environment.

What the document actually says

“Eligible producers of farm-raised fish, including fish grown as food for human consumption, shall be eligible to receive payments under this subsection to aid in the reduction of losses due to piscivorous birds.”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10401
That sentence, in plain words

Fish farmers may now get payments. The payments help with losses to fish-eating birds. Fish grown for people to eat are covered.

What this is about

Farm-raised fish means fish bred and grown in fresh water that is controlled. Wild fish are not covered. Birds that eat fish are the cause the rule names.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →