Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 10604 › Proposal

Assistive technology for farmers with disabilities gets $8,000,000

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 10604, Sec. 10604. Written by .

Assistive technology for farmers with disabilities gets $8,000,000

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of AgricultureHow: statuteSec. 10604 in the PDF
What the document says

“Subject to subsection (c)(2), of the funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary shall use to carry out this section $8,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until expended.”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10604

The section adds a new subsection (d) to section 1680 of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5933) directing $8,000,000 of Commodity Credit Corporation funds for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until expended, and inserts a cross reference to that new subsection in subsection (c)(2).

What the document actually says

“Subject to subsection (c)(2), of the funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary shall use to carry out this section $8,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until expended.”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10604
That sentence, in plain words

The Secretary must use $8 million. That is for fiscal year 2026. The money stays there until it is spent.

What this is about

The program helps farmers who are disabled. It buys tools they need to keep working. The money comes from a federal lending body.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →