Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 10606 › Proposal

The crop and pesticide use survey gets $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2026

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 10606, Sec. 10606. Written by .

The crop and pesticide use survey gets $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2026

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of AgricultureHow: statuteSec. 10606 in the PDF
What the document says

“Of the funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary shall use to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until expended.”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10606

The section adds a new paragraph (3) to section 10109(c) of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-334; 132 Stat. 4907) directing $5,000,000 of Commodity Credit Corporation funds for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until expended.

What the document actually says

“Of the funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary shall use to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2026, to remain available until expended.”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 10606
That sentence, in plain words

The Secretary must use $5 million. That is for fiscal year 2026. The money stays there until it is spent.

What this is about

The survey tracks which crops use which pesticides. The money comes from a federal lending body. The older law that sets up the survey is not indexed here.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →