“Section 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78d) is amended-- (1) by striking subsection (i); and”
The section strikes subsection (i) of section 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78d) and redesignates subsections (j) and (k) as (i) and (j).
What the document actually says
“Section 4 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78d) is amended-- (1) by striking subsection (i); and”
That sentence, in plain words
One subsection is taken out of a 1934 law. Nothing is put in its place.
What this is about
Two later subsections then move up to fill the gap. What the struck subsection said is not recorded here. That older law is not indexed.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Public Law 119-21, sec. 30003, 139 Stat. 126 (2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ21/html/PLAW-119publ21.htm
This page
“The reserve fund provision is struck from the 1934 Act,” Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 30003, Sec. 30003. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/pl-119-21/proposal/sec30003-strike/ (retrieved August 26, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
