Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 50403 › Proposal

Grid reliability becomes a reason the program may lend

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 50403, Sec. 50403. Written by .

Grid reliability becomes a reason the program may lend

The document says “is amendedWho acts: Secretary of EnergyHow: statuteSec. 50403 in the PDF
What the document says

“support or enable the provision of known or forecastable electric supply at time intervals necessary to maintain or enhance grid reliability or other system adequacy needs.”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 50403

The section adds a new paragraph (3) to subsection (a) of section 1706 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16517) making support for known or forecastable electric supply at intervals needed to maintain or improve grid reliability or other system adequacy an eligible purpose, and rewrites paragraph (2) to read increase capacity or output.

What the document actually says

“support or enable the provision of known or forecastable electric supply at time intervals necessary to maintain or enhance grid reliability or other system adequacy needs.”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 50403
That sentence, in plain words

A project may qualify if it helps keep power flowing. The supply must be known or able to be forecast. It must come when the grid needs it.

What this is about

This is a new reason to qualify for a loan. A second reason is reworded to cover raising capacity or output. The older law is not indexed here.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →