Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 70104 › Proposal

The credit and its refundable part rise with prices

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 70104, Sec. 70104. Written by .

The credit and its refundable part rise with prices

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of the TreasuryHow: statuteSec. 70104 in the PDF
What the document says

“In the case of a taxable year beginning after 2025, the $2,200 amount in subsection (h)(2) shall be increased by an amount equal to--”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70104

The section rewrites section 24(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 so that from a taxable year beginning after 2024 the $1,400 refundable amount rises by a cost of living adjustment under section 1(f)(3) measured from 2017, and from a taxable year beginning after 2025 the $2,200 credit amount rises by the same kind of adjustment measured from 2024. An increase that is not a multiple of $100 is rounded down to the next lowest multiple of $100.

What the document actually says

“In the case of a taxable year beginning after 2025, the $2,200 amount in subsection (h)(2) shall be increased by an amount equal to--”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70104
That sentence, in plain words

From a tax year that begins after 2025 the $2,200 grows. The rise is worked out as set out below.

What this is about

It follows a cost of living measure in the tax code. The refundable part grows in the same way. Any rise is rounded down to the nearest $100.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →