Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 70105 › Proposal

The deduction is never less than $400 for an applicable taxpayer

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 70105, Sec. 70105. Written by .

The deduction is never less than $400 for an applicable taxpayer

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of the TreasuryHow: statuteSec. 70105 in the PDF
What the document says

“In the case of an applicable taxpayer for any taxable year, the deduction allowed under subsection (a) for the taxable year shall be equal to the greater of--”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70105

The section rewrites subsection (i) of section 199A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 so that for an applicable taxpayer the deduction is the greater of the amount worked out without the subsection and $400, and inserts a cross reference to the new subsection into section 199A(a).

What the document actually says

“In the case of an applicable taxpayer for any taxable year, the deduction allowed under subsection (a) for the taxable year shall be equal to the greater of--”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70105
That sentence, in plain words

The deduction is the bigger of two figures. That holds for a taxpayer who qualifies. Those two figures follow below.

What this is about

One is the deduction worked out the normal way. The other is a flat $400. Whichever is larger is allowed.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →