“is amended by striking ", with respect to the applicable period".”
The section strikes the words with respect to the applicable period from section 11026(a) of Public Law 115-97, and strikes subsections (c) and (d) of section 11026 as a conforming change.
What the document actually says
“is amended by striking ", with respect to the applicable period".”
That sentence, in plain words
Words tying the rule to a set period are taken out. Those words were with respect to the applicable period.
What this is about
So the rule is no longer limited in time. Two other subsections are struck as well. That older law is not indexed here.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Public Law 119-21, sec. 70118, 139 Stat. 167 (2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ21/html/PLAW-119publ21.htm
This page
“The time limit is struck from the treatment,” Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 70118, Sec. 70118. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/pl-119-21/proposal/sec70118-permanent/ (retrieved October 10, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
