Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 70305 › Proposal

Meals on fishing vessels and at remote fish plants escape the 50 percent limit

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 70305, Sec. 70305. Written by .

Meals on fishing vessels and at remote fish plants escape the 50 percent limit

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 70305 in the PDF
What the document says

“on a fishing vessel, fish processing vessel, or fish tender vessel (as such terms are defined in section 2101 of title 46, United States Code), or”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70305

The section adds a new clause (v) to section 274(n)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 covering meals provided on a fishing vessel, fish processing vessel or fish tender vessel as those terms are defined in section 2101 of title 46, United States Code, or at a facility for processing fish for commercial use or consumption that is in the United States north of 50 degrees north latitude and outside a metropolitan statistical area within the meaning of section 143(k)(2)(B).

What the document actually says

“on a fishing vessel, fish processing vessel, or fish tender vessel (as such terms are defined in section 2101 of title 46, United States Code), or”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70305
That sentence, in plain words

Meals given on three kinds of fishing boat are named. An older shipping law says what each kind is.

What this is about

Meals at some fish plants also count. The plant must be north of 50 degrees latitude. It must be outside a city area.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →