Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 70307 › Proposal

A building never used in production may still qualify when bought

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 70307, Sec. 70307. Written by .

A building never used in production may still qualify when bought

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of the TreasuryHow: statuteSec. 70307 in the PDF
What the document says

“such property was not used in a qualified production activity (determined without regard to the second sentence of subparagraph (D)) by any”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70307

The section treats the original use and construction start tests as met for property acquired during the construction window where the property was not used in a qualified production activity by anyone from January 1, 2021 through May 12, 2025, was not used by the taxpayer before the acquisition, and the acquisition meets the requirements of paragraphs (2)(A), (2)(B), (2)(C) and (3) of section 179(d). A written binding contract fixes the acquisition date at both ends of the window.

What the document actually says

“such property was not used in a qualified production activity (determined without regard to the second sentence of subparagraph (D)) by any”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70307
That sentence, in plain words

The building must not have been used in production. That is tested against a set window of years.

What this is about

That window runs from January 1, 2021 to May 12, 2025. The buyer must also not have used it before. A signed contract fixes the buying date.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →