Bering Sea fisheries work counts toward the exempt purpose
What the document says“shall be considered substantially related to the exercise or performance of the purpose constituting the basis of such entity's exemption under section 501(a) of such Code”
The section provides that for subchapter F of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, any activity substantially related to taking part or investing in fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands statistical and reporting areas, carried on by an entity identified in section 305(i)(1)(D) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, counts as substantially related to the purpose behind the entity's exemption, where it furthers one or more of the purposes in section 305(i)(1)(A) of that Act. Such activities include harvesting, processing, transportation, sales and marketing of fish and fish products from those areas.
What the document actually says“shall be considered substantially related to the exercise or performance of the purpose constituting the basis of such entity's exemption under section 501(a) of such Code”
The work counts as part of the body's own charitable aim. That aim is the basis of its tax exempt status.
So the income is not taxed as an outside business. The work covers fishing in named Alaskan waters. It also covers processing and selling the fish.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.