Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 70431 › Proposal

Newer stock is split off with a three year holding test

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 70431, Sec. 70431. Written by .

Newer stock is split off with a three year holding test

The document says “shall notWho acts: Secretary of the TreasuryHow: statuteSec. 70431 in the PDF
What the document says

“except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), 50 percent of any gain from the sale or exchange of qualified small business stock acquired on or before the applicable date and held for more than 5 years, and”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70431

The section rewrites section 1202(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 so that for a taxpayer other than a corporation gross income leaves out 50 percent of gain on qualified small business stock acquired on or before the applicable date and held more than five years, and the applicable percentage of gain on stock acquired after the applicable date and held at least three years.

What the document actually says

“except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), 50 percent of any gain from the sale or exchange of qualified small business stock acquired on or before the applicable date and held for more than 5 years, and”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70431
That sentence, in plain words

Half the gain on older stock is left out of income. That stock must have been held more than five years.

What this is about

Newer stock is treated under a second rule. It needs only three years of holding. Its share is set by a table.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →