“in clause (iii), by inserting "and" after the comma at the end,”
The section amends section 30D(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by striking clause (v) of paragraph (1)(B) and clauses (iv) through (vi) of paragraph (2)(B), with matching punctuation edits in the clauses before them.
What the document actually says
“in clause (iii), by inserting "and" after the comma at the end,”
That sentence, in plain words
One word is added at the end of a clause. That word is and.
What this is about
Those edits tidy up two lists. Clauses at the end of each list are struck. What they said is not recorded here.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Public Law 119-21, sec. 70502, 139 Stat. 250 (2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ21/html/PLAW-119publ21.htm
This page
“Clauses in the critical mineral and battery rules are struck,” Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 70502, Sec. 70502. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/pl-119-21/proposal/sec70502-conforming/ (retrieved October 10, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
