Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 70513 › Proposal

Qualified fuel cell property gets a flat 30 percent

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 70513, Sec. 70513. Written by .

Qualified fuel cell property gets a flat 30 percent

The document says “shallWho acts: Secretary of the TreasuryHow: statuteSec. 70513 in the PDF
What the document says

“for purposes of subsection (a)(1), the applicable percentage shall be 30 percent and such percentage shall not be increased or otherwise adjusted by any other provision of this section, and”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70513

The section inserts a new subsection (j) into section 48E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 so that for qualified fuel cell property as defined in section 48(c)(1) read without subparagraph (E), one clause of the qualified facility test is disregarded, the applicable percentage is a flat 30 percent that no other provision may raise or adjust, and subsection (g) does not apply. It also adds a rule freezing the energy percentage for certain energy property.

What the document actually says

“for purposes of subsection (a)(1), the applicable percentage shall be 30 percent and such percentage shall not be increased or otherwise adjusted by any other provision of this section, and”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 70513
That sentence, in plain words

The rate is 30 percent for this property. No other rule in the section may raise it.

What this is about

Fuel cell property is treated apart. One test that would apply is switched off. So is one other subsection.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →