A state may raise the limit for a non-farm home up to $1,000,000
What the document says“A State may elect, without regard to the requirements of section 1902(a)(1) (relating to statewideness) and section 1902(a)(10)(B) (relating to comparability), to apply subparagraph (A), in the case of an individual's home that is not described in clause (i), by substituting for the amount specified in such subparagraph, an amount that exceeds such amount, but does not exceed $1,000,000.”
The section amends section 1917(f)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(f)(1)) so that the existing higher limit election applies to a home on a lot zoned for agricultural use, and adds a new clause letting a State elect a higher figure for any other home up to $1,000,000, without regard to the statewideness and comparability rules.
What the document actually says“A State may elect, without regard to the requirements of section 1902(a)(1) (relating to statewideness) and section 1902(a)(10)(B) (relating to comparability), to apply subparagraph (A), in the case of an individual's home that is not described in clause (i), by substituting for the amount specified in such subparagraph, an amount that exceeds such amount, but does not exceed $1,000,000.”
A state may raise the limit for a home. That home must not be the farm kind. The new figure may not top $1 million.
Two usual rules are set aside for this. One requires the same rule across the state. The other requires like treatment.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.