Some people are deemed to have met the rule
What the document says“The State shall deem an applicable individual to have demonstrated community engagement under paragraph (2) for a month, and may elect to not require an individual to verify information resulting in such deeming, if--”
The section requires the State to treat a person as having met the rule for a month where, for part or all of that month, the person was a specified excluded individual, was under 19, was entitled to or enrolled for Medicare part A or enrolled for part B, or fell within named subclauses of section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i), and where a short-term hardship event applied during a three month window. The State may choose not to make the person verify the facts behind the deeming.
What the document actually says“The State shall deem an applicable individual to have demonstrated community engagement under paragraph (2) for a month, and may elect to not require an individual to verify information resulting in such deeming, if--”
The state must treat the person as having met the rule. It may also skip asking them to prove it.
Several groups are covered. Under 19s are one. People on Medicare are another. A short-term hardship also counts.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.