“Promoting evidence-based, measurable interventions to improve prevention and chronic disease management.”
The section requires a State to use its allotment for three or more listed activities: promoting evidence-based prevention and chronic disease management; paying providers for items or services; consumer facing technology for chronic disease; training and technical help for remote monitoring, robotics, artificial intelligence and similar tools; recruiting and keeping clinicians with a five year rural commitment; information technology and cybersecurity; right sizing local care delivery; supporting opioid, other substance use and mental health treatment; value based care models; and other uses the Administrator sets. No more than 10 percent may go to administration.
What the document actually says
“Promoting evidence-based, measurable interventions to improve prevention and chronic disease management.”
That sentence, in plain words
One listed use is backing steps that can be measured. They must improve prevention and long-term care.
What this is about
The state must pick three or more listed uses. They cover provider pay and new tools. No more than a tenth may go to running costs.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.
Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Public Law 119-21, sec. 71401, 139 Stat. 327 (2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ21/html/PLAW-119publ21.htm
This page
“Money must go to three or more of ten listed activities,” Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 71401, Sec. 71401. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/pl-119-21/proposal/sec71401-use/ (retrieved August 26, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How to Read This Page
The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page
number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary,
not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the
quotation rather than replacing it.
