Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 83002 › Proposal

A Governor must find the program fits in-demand work and stacks

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 83002, Sec. 83002. Written by .

A Governor must find the program fits in-demand work and stacks

The document says “shallWho acts: Governor of a StateHow: statuteSec. 83002 in the PDF
What the document says

“the Governor of a State, after consultation with the State board, determines that the program--”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 83002

The section requires the Governor, after consulting the State board, to find that the program teaches skills matching high-skill, high-wage or in-demand sectors as identified under section 122 of the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act, meets employers' hiring requirements, either leads to a recognized credential that stacks and carries across more than one employer or gives the only credential the occupation has, and prepares students for further certificate or degree programs, with credit that will be accepted toward them.

What the document actually says

“the Governor of a State, after consultation with the State board, determines that the program--”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 83002
That sentence, in plain words

The Governor must first look at the course. The State board is consulted. The tests that follow say what is checked.

What this is about

The course must match jobs in demand. It must meet what employers ask for. It must lead to a credential that carries over.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →