Read theMandate

Provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14Section 90005 › Proposal

Grants cover drone threats, the World Cup, the Olympics and Stonegarden

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, section 90005, Sec. 90005. Written by .

Grants cover drone threats, the World Cup, the Olympics and Stonegarden

The document says “shallWho acts: Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management AgencyHow: statuteSec. 90005 in the PDF
What the document says

“$500,000,000 for State and local capabilities to detect, identify, track, or monitor threats from unmanned aircraft systems”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 90005

The section appropriates to the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for fiscal year 2025, available until September 30, 2029, under the State Homeland Security Grant Program: $500,000,000 for State and local capabilities against threats from unmanned aircraft systems, $625,000,000 for security and other costs of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, $1,000,000,000 for the 2028 Olympics, and $450,000,000 for the Operation Stonegarden Grant Program. The World Cup and Olympics money is not subject to two named conditions in the Homeland Security Act of 2002.

What the document actually says

“$500,000,000 for State and local capabilities to detect, identify, track, or monitor threats from unmanned aircraft systems”

To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14, Sec. 90005
That sentence, in plain words

Five hundred million dollars goes to states and towns. It builds ways to spot and track drone threats.

What this is about

Three more sums follow. One covers the 2026 World Cup. One covers the 2028 Olympics. One covers a border grant program.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →