What the document says“if any person which is a member of such controlled group (other than such publicly held corporation) provides applicable employee remuneration to an individual who is a specified covered employee of such controlled group and the aggregate amount described in subparagraph (B)(ii) with respect to such specified covered employee exceeds $1,000,000--”
The section adds a new paragraph (7) to section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. For a publicly held corporation in a controlled group the deduction cap is read as covering a specified covered employee, and where another group member pays such an employee and the total across the group tops $1,000,000, the cap applies to that member too and each of them uses an allocable limitation amount in place of $1,000,000.
What the document actually says“if any person which is a member of such controlled group (other than such publicly held corporation) provides applicable employee remuneration to an individual who is a specified covered employee of such controlled group and the aggregate amount described in subparagraph (B)(ii) with respect to such specified covered employee exceeds $1,000,000--”
Pay from another firm in the group counts. The test is whether the total for that person tops $1 million.
The cap then bites on that firm as well. Each firm gets only part of the $1 million. The next rule works out each share.
No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.