Read theMandate

Reauthorize certain programs that provide for opioid use disorder prevention, treatment, and recoverySection 106 › Proposal

The spending ceiling rises to $57,000,000 a year through 2030

To reauthorize certain programs that provide for opioid use disorder prevention, treatment, and recovery, and for other purposes, section 106, Sec. 106. Written by .

The spending ceiling rises to $57,000,000 a year through 2030

The document says “is amendedWho acts: CongressHow: statuteSec. 106 in the PDF
What the document says

“in subsection (h), by striking ``$36,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023'' and inserting ``$57,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030''.”

To reauthorize certain programs that provide for opioid use disorder prevention, treatment, and recovery, and for other purposes, Sec. 106

The section amends section 546(h) of the Public Health Service Act, replacing the ceiling of $36,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023 with $57,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.

What the document actually says

“in subsection (h), by striking ``$36,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023'' and inserting ``$57,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030''.”

To reauthorize certain programs that provide for opioid use disorder prevention, treatment, and recovery, and for other purposes, Sec. 106
That sentence, in plain words

The old top amount was $36,000,000 a year. The new top amount is $57,000,000 a year. It runs from 2026 through 2030.

What this is about

Congress sets a ceiling here, not a payment. The money still has to be voted on later.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →