Read theMandate

Reauthorize certain programs that provide for opioid use disorder prevention, treatment, and recoverySection 110 › Proposal

The Work Group must consult experts and families of people who overdosed

To reauthorize certain programs that provide for opioid use disorder prevention, treatment, and recovery, and for other purposes, section 110, Sec. 110. Written by .

The Work Group must consult experts and families of people who overdosed

The document says “shallWho acts: the Federal Interagency Work Group on Fentanyl Contamination of Illegal DrugsHow: statuteSec. 110 in the PDF
What the document says

“The Work Group shall consult with relevant stakeholders and subject matter experts, including--”

To reauthorize certain programs that provide for opioid use disorder prevention, treatment, and recovery, and for other purposes, Sec. 110

The section requires the work group to consult State, Tribal and local subject matter experts in reducing, preventing and responding to overdose caused by fentanyl contamination, and family members of both adults and youth who have overdosed on contaminated drugs.

What the document actually says

“The Work Group shall consult with relevant stakeholders and subject matter experts, including--”

To reauthorize certain programs that provide for opioid use disorder prevention, treatment, and recovery, and for other purposes, Sec. 110
That sentence, in plain words

The work group must talk to people outside the government. It must talk to experts in States, Tribes and towns. It must also talk to families who lost someone.

What this is about

Consulting means asking and listening. It does not mean those people get a vote. The work group still decides what to say.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Act itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this section →