Read theMandate

Land Management rule disapproved: Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook…Provision 1 › Proposal

The Minnesota land withdrawal order is undone

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN, provision 1,  1. Written by .

The Minnesota land withdrawal order is undone

The document says “shall notWho acts: CongressHow: statute 1 in the PDF
What the document says

“Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management of the Department of the Interior relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN (88 Fed. Reg. 6308 (January 31, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.”

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN,  1

A resolution of disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code, the Congressional Review Act. It names the rule by the title the agency gave it and by where the rule was published, and it states no reason. What the rule itself required is not described here, because that rule is not one of the documents this site has indexed.

What the document actually says

“Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management of the Department of the Interior relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN (88 Fed. Reg. 6308 (January 31, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.”

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN,  1
That sentence, in plain words

Congress votes down a rule about holding back land in Minnesota. The rule now has no force.

What this is about

The BLM wrote a rule about holding back land in Minnesota. Congress voted to undo it. The rule is dead. It binds no one now. Congress used a law that lets it undo a new rule within a set time.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken, and nobody has yet read it against the record. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Land Management rule disapproved: Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook…, Public Law 119-85, sec. 1, 140 Stat. 772 (2026).
    https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ85/html/PLAW-119publ85.htm

  2. This page

    “The Minnesota land withdrawal order is undone,” Land Management rule disapproved: Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook…, provision 1, 1. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/pl-119-85/proposal/sec01-disapproval/ (retrieved August 26, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the Resolution itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this provision →