Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 16

Department of the Interior

Chapter 16 · pp. 517–544 · William Perry Pendley

What this chapter is about

This chapter is about public land. It says the land should be used more, not less. It wants more drilling and more mining. It wants old land orders in Alaska lifted. It also says Congress should let the government cut the number of wild horses on public land.

11 proposals indexed from this chapter.

The document says “mustWho acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 529 in the PDF
What the document says

“Congress must enact laws permitting the BLM to dispose humanely of these animals.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 529

The chapter states there are 95,000 wild horses and burros on nearly 32 million acres, triple what it says the range can support, that the population has more than doubled in ten years and grows at 10 to 15 percent annually, and that more than 47,000 already gathered are held in off-range corrals at a cost of nearly $50 million a year. It cites a 2019 joint policy of the American Association of Equine Practitioners and the American Veterinary Medical Association calling for further reducing overpopulation, endorsed by the National Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board, and says the ASPCA and the Humane Society recognize that unchecked herd growth threatens the animals. It lists the BLM's 2020 approach, which includes expanded adoptions and sales of gathered horses, increased gathers and holding capacity, fertility control and contraceptive research, and says all of that will not be enough.

What the document actually says

“Congress must enact laws permitting the BLM to dispose humanely of these animals.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 529
That sentence, in plain words

None of that will fix it. Congress must pass a law letting the agency put these animals down humanely.

What this is about

About 95,000 wild horses and burros live on public land. The book says the land cannot feed them all. Some are caught and kept in pens. That costs about $50 million a year. The book says Congress should let the agency get rid of some of them.

What is disputed
The document does not define this “dispose humanely”

The chapter does not define what disposing humanely would mean, and names no method. The words slaughter and euthanize appear nowhere in this chapter. Slaughter appears once in the whole book, on p.305, in a reference to the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act of 1978 in a passage about state meat inspection, unconnected to horses.

What this means is contested

Widely reported as a proposal to sell wild horses for slaughter. The chapter does mention sales, but as a description of the BLM's existing 2020 approach, which it says is insufficient. Readers who take the sentence to mean killing point out that what currently stops the BLM from destroying healthy excess animals, or selling them without limitation, is a set of appropriations restrictions, so a law permitting disposal would have to displace them. Readers who reject that point out the chapter says neither, and cites veterinary and animal welfare bodies on overpopulation.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “mustWho acts: Congress, PresidentHow: legislationp. 532 in the PDF
What the document says

“the new Administration must seek repeal of the Antiquities Act of 1906”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 532

The Antiquities Act lets a President designate national monuments by proclamation. The chapter argues it permitted emergency action before statutory authority existed to protect special federal lands, and that in recent years Congress has designated as monuments the areas deserving it. It separately says the Trump review of monument designations was insufficient because only two monuments in one state were adjusted, names Maine and Oregon as places where downward adjustments should have followed, and asks that such adjustments be vigorously defended to obtain a Supreme Court ruling on a President's authority to shrink a monument.

What the document actually says

“the new Administration must seek repeal of the Antiquities Act of 1906”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 532
That sentence, in plain words

The next team must try to repeal this old law. It dates from 1906.

What this is about

A 1906 law lets a president protect land by proclamation. Those places are called national monuments. The book says Congress should do that job instead. It wants the law repealed.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “mustWho acts: President, DOIHow: internal managementp. 521 in the PDF
What the document says

“A new Administration must immediately roll back Biden’s orders, reinstate the Trump-era Energy Dominance Agenda”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 521

The chapter asks for the immediate reinstatement of a list of Trump-era secretarial orders and for the rescission of current ones, and separately for quarterly onshore oil and gas lease sales in all producing states, following an earlier instruction memorandum with expanded public notice and comment.

What the document actually says

“A new Administration must immediately roll back Biden’s orders, reinstate the Trump-era Energy Dominance Agenda”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 521
That sentence, in plain words

Undo the current orders at once. Bring back the energy plan from before.

What this is about

This department controls drilling on public land. The book says the current rules block it. It wants the older rules back.

What has happened
Closely matches

Unleashing Alaska's Extraordinary Resource Potential

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8347

Matches the chapter's request to roll back current orders and restore an energy development agenda on Alaskan lands.

The document says “mustWho acts: DOI, BLMHow: internal managementp. 522 in the PDF
What the document says

“Reinstate quarterly onshore lease sales in all producing states”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 522

The chapter asks that these follow the model of an earlier BLM instruction memorandum with the adjustment of expanded public notice and comment, and that the Administration work with Congress on legislation including the Lease Now Act.

What the document actually says

“Reinstate quarterly onshore lease sales in all producing states”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 522
That sentence, in plain words

Hold land sales for drilling four times a year. Do it in every state that produces.

What this is about

Companies lease public land to drill. Those leases are sold at auctions. The book says the auctions should happen four times a year.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “mustWho acts: DOIHow: internal managementp. 530 in the PDF
What the document says

“the new Administration must immediately approve the Ambler Road Project”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 530

The chapter says approval would permit construction of a 211-mile roadway on the south side of the Brooks Range, and that it should proceed under the Secretary's authority in the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act and on the basis of the project's final environmental impact statement. It describes Alaska as having vast untapped mineral potential.

What the document actually says

“the new Administration must immediately approve the Ambler Road Project”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 530
That sentence, in plain words

Approve the Ambler Road plan right away.

What this is about

A mining road is planned in Alaska. It would run 211 miles. The book says it should be approved at once.

What has happened
Partly matches

Unleashing Alaska's Extraordinary Resource Potential

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8347

The chapter asked for immediate approval of the Ambler Road project. This order pauses activity under the 2024 record of decision pending review and reinstates the 2020 record of decision, which is a step toward that outcome by a different route than immediate approval.

The document says “shouldWho acts: DOI, BLMHow: internal managementp. 530 in the PDF
What the document says

“All other remaining BLM PLOs—all of which are more than 50 years old—should be revoked immediately.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 530

The chapter states that Alaska and Alaska Natives each still have 5 million acres of entitlement outstanding, that public land orders issued by the BLM stand in the way, and that revoking one order in particular would deliver 1.3 million acres to the state and should be a top priority.

What the document actually says

“All other remaining BLM PLOs—all of which are more than 50 years old—should be revoked immediately.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 530
That sentence, in plain words

The rest of these land orders are over 50 years old. Revoke them all at once.

What this is about

Alaska was promised land when it became a state. Some was never handed over. Old orders hold it back. The book says those orders should go.

What has happened
Partly matches

Unleashing Alaska's Extraordinary Resource Potential

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8347

The chapter named Public Land Order 5150 specifically, saying its revocation would give Alaska 1.3 million acres and should be a top priority. This order directs that changes to it, including potential rescission, be evaluated. Directing an evaluation is not the revocation the chapter asked for.

The document says “should considerWho acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 533 in the PDF
What the document says

“Consideration should be given, for example, to eliminating judicial review of the adequacy of NEPA documents”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 533

The chapter raises this as something to consider rather than as a recommendation, and says it would allow Congress to engage in effective oversight of federal agencies when prudent. It separately asks that Trump-era environmental review reforms be restored, including time and page limits.

What the document actually says

“Consideration should be given, for example, to eliminating judicial review of the adequacy of NEPA documents”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 533
That sentence, in plain words

One idea is to stop courts checking these reports.

What this is about

Big projects need a report on harm to nature. People can sue if the report is poor. The book says courts could be shut out of that. It offers this as an idea.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “mustWho acts: DOI, BLMHow: internal managementp. 533 in the PDF
What the document says

“the new Administration must immediately fulfill its responsibilities and manage the O&C lands for “permanent forest production””

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 533

The O&C lands are Oregon forest lands governed by a 1937 statute requiring management for permanent forest production, with timber to be sold, cut and removed. The chapter says doing so would fulfill the congressional mandate, provide employment in rural Oregon and reduce the effects of wildfires.

What the document actually says

“the new Administration must immediately fulfill its responsibilities and manage the O&C lands for “permanent forest production””

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 533
That sentence, in plain words

Manage these Oregon forests for timber. That is what the law says.

What this is about

Some Oregon forests are run under an old law. It says the timber should be cut and sold. The book says that is not happening now.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “requiresWho acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 533 in the PDF
What the document says

“Meaningful reform of the Endangered Species Act requires that Congress take action to restore its original purpose”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 533

The chapter says the act is used to seize private property, prevent economic development and interfere with the rights of states over their wildlife populations, and asks Congress to end those uses. It says a new Administration should take immediate action in the meantime.

What the document actually says

“Meaningful reform of the Endangered Species Act requires that Congress take action to restore its original purpose”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 533
That sentence, in plain words

Congress must act on this law. It should go back to what it was for.

What this is about

One law protects animals at risk of dying out. The book says it is used to block building. It says Congress should change it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: DOIHow: internal managementp. 533 in the PDF
What the document says

“A new Administration should reinstate it.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 533

The policy required the department to display and provide open access to all litigation settlements it entered and any attorneys' fees paid to end the litigation. The chapter says the current department ended the policy because the settlements it planned to enter and the fees it expected to pay would cause controversy.

What the document actually says

“A new Administration should reinstate it.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 533
That sentence, in plain words

The next team should bring that rule back.

What this is about

The department settles lawsuits. It used to publish each deal. It also published the legal fees. The book says that should start again.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “mustWho acts: PresidentHow: executive orderp. 524 in the PDF
What the document says

“President Trump’s Schedule F proposal”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 524

The full passage says the Schedule F proposal on accountability in hiring must be reinstituted to bring success to these reforms. The chapter also says states are better resource managers than the federal government because they must live with the results, and asks the department to broaden state and tribal cooperative agreements. Schedule F is the subject of a separate proposal in chapter 3.

What the document actually says

“President Trump’s Schedule F proposal”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 524
That sentence, in plain words

There was a plan called Schedule F. President Trump put it forward.

What this is about

Schedule F would make some staff easy to fire. It covers workers whose jobs shape policy. This chapter says it is needed here too.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

What is indexed here, and what is not

Recommendations on energy leasing, national monuments, Alaska land and minerals, environmental review, forest management, endangered species, wild horses and burros, law enforcement, transparency and personnel.

The chapter's account of the department's history, its detailed treatment of the surface mining office and the Bureau of Reclamation, and its recommendations on American Indian affairs beyond the land buy-back program.

The proposal on wild horses and burros is the subject of widely circulated claims. The entry records the sentence, notes that the chapter defines no method, and records the competing readings without resolving them.