Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 16 › Proposal

Reinstate Schedule F to support the department's reforms

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 16, p. 524. Written by William Perry Pendley.

Reinstate Schedule F to support the department's reforms

The document says “must”Who acts: PresidentHow: executive orderp. 524 in the PDF
What the document says

“President Trump’s Schedule F proposal”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 524

The full passage says the Schedule F proposal on accountability in hiring must be reinstituted to bring success to these reforms. The chapter also says states are better resource managers than the federal government because they must live with the results, and asks the department to broaden state and tribal cooperative agreements. Schedule F is the subject of a separate proposal in chapter 3.

What the document actually says

“President Trump’s Schedule F proposal”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 524
That sentence, in plain words

There was a plan called Schedule F. President Trump put it forward.

What this is about

Schedule F would make some staff easy to fire. It covers workers whose jobs shape policy. This chapter says it is needed here too.

What has happened
Closely matches

Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8625

EO 14171 reinstates EO 13957, the Schedule F order, with amendments, renames the schedule Schedule Policy/Career, and revokes the 2021 order that had undone it. That is the reinstatement the passage asks for, and it applies across the government. The order places no Interior position in the schedule by itself, which happens by agency recommendation under OPM's final rule of February 6, 2026, and positions in the schedule stay career and nonpartisan rather than becoming political. None of the candidates offered here is that order: three are cases and one is a Transportation Department procedures rule.

In plain English

The order brings back a 2020 job class and gives it a new name. It also pulls the 2021 order that had undone it. That is the step the passage asks for, and it covers the whole government. But no job at the Interior Department is placed in the class here. That happens when an agency asks, under a rule from February 2026. Such jobs stay career, not political.

What cites those orders

1 agency rule

Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 524.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Reinstate Schedule F to support the department's reforms,” Project 2025, chapter 16, p. 524. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch16-schedule-f-at-interior/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →