Documents › Agency rules › 2026-02375
Personnel Management Office
Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service
Published February 6, 2026. Takes effect March 9, 2026, printed at 91 FR 5580, amending 5 CFR 210, 5 CFR 212, 5 CFR 213, 5 CFR 302. 86,033 words.
This changes how career federal staff are held to account for their work.
What the Rule Says It Does
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a rule to increase career employee accountability. Agency supervisors report great difficulty removing employees for poor performance or misconduct. The final rule authorizes agencies to move policy-influencing positions into Schedule Policy/Career. These positions will remain career jobs filled on a nonpartisan basis. Yet they will be at-will positions excepted from adverse action procedures or appeals. This will allow agencies to quickly remove employees from critical positions who engage in misconduct, perform poorly, or obstruct the democratic process by intentionally subverting Presidential directives. The rule requires agencies to establish internal policies protecting employees from prohibited personnel practices.
This is the rule's own summary, as the Federal Register prints it.
The Order It Names
The rule names this order itself. What it does about it is a reading, and none is recorded here.
On the Face of the Rule
- As filed
[Federal Register Volume 91, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2026)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 5580-5657] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2026-02375]
Vol. 91
Friday,
No. 25
February 6, 2026
Part II
Office of Personnel Management
5 CFR Parts 210, 212, 213, et al.
Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service; Final Rule
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 210, 212, 213, 302, 432, 451, 537, 575, and 752
[Docket ID: OPM-2025-0004] RIN 3206-AO80
Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service
- AGENCY
Office of Personnel Management.
- ACTION
Final rule.
- DATES
Effective March 9, 2026.
- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Noah Peters, Senior Advisor to the Director, by email at [email protected] or by phone at (202) 606-293.
The fields the Federal Register prints at the head of the rule, quoted as printed. Its summary is quoted above.
Why the Agency Says It Is Doing This
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
I. Executive Summary
OPM is issuing final regulations to strengthen employee accountability and the democratic responsiveness of American Government, while addressing longstanding performance management challenges in the Federal workforce. The final rule amends OPM's regulations in 5 CFR chapter I, subchapter B, as follows:
1. Amending 5 CFR part 213 (Excepted Service) to include Schedule Policy/Career as an excepted service schedule for career positions of a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character (policy-influencing \1\ positions), while clarifying that Schedule C appointments are exclusively for noncareer (i.e., political) appointments with confidential or policy responsibilities. The amended regulations further clarify that employees filling excepted service positions are in the excepted service, regardless of whether they retain competitive status, and specifies increasing accountability to the President as grounds for excepting positions from the competitive service.
\1\ Throughout this rulemaking OPM uses the term “policy- influencing” as a shorthand descriptor of the broader statutory language “confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating.” See 5 U.S.C. 7511(b)(2).
2. Amending 5 CFR part 212 (Competitive Service and Competitive Status) to provide that employees with competitive status whose positions are subsequently listed in the excepted service or who are moved into an excepted service position retain competitive status but do not remain in the competitive service while in the excepted position.
3. Amending 5 CFR part 752 (Adverse Actions) to remove the amendments made by the April 2024 final rule and provide that individuals whose positions are reclassified into or who are otherwise transferred into Schedule Policy/Career are not covered by chapter 75 procedural requirements or adverse action appeals. Additionally, OPM amends 5 CFR part 752 to remove language pertaining to 10 U.S.C. 1599e, which provided for a 2-year probationary period in the Department of Defense. This language has become obsolete as section 1599e was repealed, effective December 31, 2022, by Public Law 117-81, Sec. 1106(a)(1). The rule further amends 5 CFR part 432 (Performance Based Reduction in Grade and Removal Actions) to remove the amendments made by the April 2024 final rule and to exclude all policy-influencing positions in the excepted service from chapter 43 procedural requirements for performance-based removals.
4. Amending 5 CFR part 210 (Basic Concepts and Definitions (General)) to remove the amendments made by the April 2024 final rule stating that policy-influencing positions are exclusively associated with noncareer political appointments. The final rule also amends 5 CFR 213.3301, 302.101, and 451.302 to conform to the rescission of these definitions.
5. Amending 5 CFR part 302 to remove the amendments made by the April 2024 final rule imposing procedural requirements on movements of positions or employees into policy-influencing excepted service positions (including subsequent Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) appeals). The final rule also provides that moving or transferring positions into Schedule Policy/Career will not change how appointments to those positions are made. Positions moved from the competitive service will be filled using competitive hiring procedures and employees so appointed may acquire competitive status. Positions moved from the excepted service will continue to be filled using the procedures that applied to their prior excepted service schedule.
6. Amending 5 CFR part 537 to allow employees reassigned to positions in Schedule Policy/Career to continue to receive student loan repayment benefits under the terms of the applicable service agreement unless eligibility is lost as described in 5 CFR 537.108.
7. Amending 5 CFR part 575 at subparts A, B, and C to allow agencies to continue paying any outstanding recruitment, relocation, or retention incentive under the terms of existing agreements for positions moved into Schedule Policy/Career provided the employees are otherwise fulfilling the terms of their service agreements. This final rule also permits agencies to continue paying a retention incentive to an employee who is not under a service agreement at the time when their position is moved into Schedule Policy/Career.
As further detailed below, this rulemaking will promote Federal employee accountability and strengthen American democracy while addressing performance management challenges and issues with misconduct within the Federal workforce. It will give agencies the practical ability to separate employees who insert partisanship into their official duties, engage in corruption, or otherwise fail to uphold merit principles. OPM may set forth policies, procedures, standards, and supplementary guidance for the implementation of this final rule.
The passage that opens the rule's preamble, where the agency sets out what it is doing and on what authority. Every heading that follows it is listed below.
What the Rule Contains
Every heading the Federal Register prints in this rule, in the order it prints them. 60 headings, 86,033 words in all.
- AGENCYOn its face · 5 words
- ACTIONOn its face · 3 words
- SUMMARYOn its face · 105 words
- DATESOn its face · 5 words
- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACTOn its face · 22 words
- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATIONPreamble · 2 words
- I. Executive SummaryPreamble · 704 words
- II. Digest of Public CommentsPreamble · 368 words
- III. Background and Related CommentsPreamble · 5 words
- A. History of the Civil Service and Removal RestrictionsPreamble · 2,666 words
- B. Executive Orders 13957, 14003, 14171, and the Prior OPM RulemakingPreamble · 2,093 words
- C. Reasons for New RulemakingPreamble · 5 words
- 1. Change in Administration Policy and Operative Legal StandardsPreamble · 15,022 words
- All Supervisors Are Not Included in Schedule Policy/CareerPreamble · 5,692 words
- MSPB's Interpretation of Policy-Influencing Terms in O'Brien Are Not DispositivePreamble · 491 words
- Employees Do Not Accrue Appeal RightsPreamble · 2,802 words
- D. OPM's Authority To RegulatePreamble · 1,103 words
- IV. Regulatory Amendments and Related CommentsPreamble · 64 words
- A. Incorporating Schedule Policy/Career Into the Civil Service RegulationsPreamble · 4,589 words
- B. Meaning of the Phrase “Positions of Confidential, Policy- Determining, Policy-Making, or Policy-Advocating Character”Preamble · 299 words
- C. Adverse Action Procedures and AppealsPreamble · 1,882 words
- D. Agency Procedures for Moving Positions Into, or Between Excepted Service SchedulesPreamble · 5,081 words
- E. Retaining Career Hiring ProceduresPreamble · 780 words
- V. Addressing Further ObjectionsPreamble · 63 words
- A. Schedule Policy/Career Rejects PatronagePreamble · 44 words
- i. Agencies Will Not Engage in Mass or Political FiringsPreamble · 2,499 words
- B. Bureaucratic Autonomy Undermines DemocracyPreamble · 2,100 words
- C. Schedule Policy/Career Is LawfulPreamble · 5 words
- i. Administrative Procedure Act and PPPsPreamble · 9,176 words
- Individualized Due Process Will Not Be Provided to Affected EmployeesPreamble · 826 words
- This Final Rule Does Not Violate the Supreme Court's Holding in ArnettPreamble · 560 words
- The Final Rule Does Not Conflict With PerryPreamble · 8,726 words
- D. Schedule Policy/Career Will Improve Government PerformancePreamble · 5,870 words
- E. Reliance InterestsPreamble · 3,166 words
- VI. Regulatory AnalysisPreamble · 3 words
- A. Statement of NeedPreamble · 190 words
- B. Regulatory AlternativesPreamble · 887 words
- C. ImpactPreamble · 225 words
- D. CostsPreamble · 1,268 words
- E. BenefitsPreamble · 1,183 words
- VII. Procedural Issues and Regulatory ReviewPreamble · 6 words
- A. SeverabilityPreamble · 536 words
- B. Regulatory Flexibility ActPreamble · 41 words
- C. Regulatory ReviewPreamble · 131 words
- D. FederalismPreamble · 64 words
- E. Civil Justice ReformPreamble · 23 words
- F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995Preamble · 53 words
- G. Congressional Review ActPreamble · 25 words
- H. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)Preamble · 26 words
- List of SubjectsRegulatory text · 118 words
- Subpart A--Applicability of Regulations; DefinitionsRegulatory text · 75 words
- Subpart D--Effect of Competitive Status on PromotionRegulatory text · 219 words
- Subpart A--General ProvisionsRegulatory text · 1,068 words
- Subpart C--Excepted SchedulesRegulatory text · 140 words
- Schedule Policy/CareerRegulatory text · 540 words
- Subpart A--General ProvisionsRegulatory text · 293 words
- Subpart C--Presidential Rank AwardsRegulatory text · 290 words
- Subpart A--Recruitment IncentivesRegulatory text · 301 words
- Subpart B--Relocation IncentivesRegulatory text · 303 words
- Subpart C--Retention IncentivesRegulatory text · 1,108 words
The Rest of the Text
This rule runs to 86,033 words. The rest of it is set out over 6 pages, split at the rule's own headings so that no heading is parted from the words printed under it.
- Text 1 of 6: II. Digest of Public Comments to C. Reasons for New Rulemaking5 headings · 5,137 words
- Text 2 of 6: 1. Change in Administration Policy and Operative Legal Standards1 heading · 15,022 words
- Text 3 of 6: All Supervisors Are Not Included in Schedule Policy/Career to C. Adverse Action Procedures and Appeals8 headings · 16,922 words
- Text 4 of 6: D. Agency Procedures for Moving Positions Into, or Between Excepted Service Schedules to i. Administrative Procedure Act and PPPs8 headings · 19,748 words
- Text 5 of 6: Individualized Due Process Will Not Be Provided to Affected Employees to A. Statement of Need7 headings · 19,341 words
- Text 6 of 6: B. Regulatory Alternatives to Subpart C--Retention Incentives24 headings · 8,923 words
- The rule itself
Personnel Management Office, “Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service,” 91 FR 5580 (February 6, 2026). Effective March 9, 2026.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/02/06/2026-02375/improving-performance-accountability-and-responsiveness-in-the-civil-service - This page
“Improving Performance, Accountability and Responsiveness in the Civil Service,” a final rule naming an order indexed here. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/rules/rule-2026-02375/ (retrieved October 10, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
How This Rule Is Set Out
Federal Register documents are United States government works and are not under copyright, so the rule is here whole rather than cut to an excerpt. It is split at the headings the Register itself prints: the line it is filed under, the captioned fields on its face, the preamble where the agency says what it is doing and why, and the amendments to the Code of Federal Regulations. No passage is shortened. This rule is long enough that its text is set out over 6 pages rather than one.
Two things the Register prints are not reproduced: the running head it repeats at every page break, and the tables it sets as pictures rather than as words. Its own marker for one of those tables, [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED], is left standing where the table was, so a reader can see that something is there and follow the link to the page it is on.
A heading with nothing quoted under it is one the rule prints on its own, with the words that follow it set under the headings beneath.