This chapter is about the armed forces. It says China is the biggest danger. It wants the military built up and better armed. It also wants big changes to who can serve. It asks for more ships, more soldiers, and more planes. And it asks to end training programs it does not like.
The document says “should”Who acts: President, DODHow: internal managementp. 93 in the PDF
What the document says
“Prioritize a denial defense against China. U.S. defense planning should focus on China and, in particular, the effective denial defense of Taiwan.”
The chapter states that China is the most significant danger to American security and that the most severe immediate threat is to Taiwan and allies along the first island chain. It asks that all defense efforts focus on prevailing in that scenario, and that conventional force planning be set to defeat a Chinese invasion of Taiwan before resources are allocated to other missions such as fighting a second conflict at the same time.
What the document actually says
“Prioritize a denial defense against China. U.S. defense planning should focus on China and, in particular, the effective denial defense of Taiwan.”
That sentence, in plain words
Put China first. Defense plans should aim to stop China taking Taiwan.
What this is about
Taiwan is an island near China. China says it belongs to China. The book says stopping that should come first. It says other war plans should come second.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. The Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act requires the State Department to review its Taiwan Guidelines, the internal rules governing contacts between American and Taiwanese officials, and to report on them to Congress periodically. It concerns diplomatic contact, not force planning, and does nothing to make the denial defense of Taiwan the organizing priority for conventional forces. The other candidates adjust tariffs tied to the opioid supply chain or assign the military a border mission. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “must”Who acts: President, DODHow: internal managementp. 94 in the PDF
What the document says
“Transform NATO so that U.S. allies are capable of fielding the great majority of the conventional forces required to deter Russia”
The chapter says allies must take far greater responsibility for their conventional defense, and proposes that European allies field the great majority of conventional forces needed to deter Russia while relying on the United States mainly for the nuclear deterrent and selected other capabilities, with a reduced American force posture in Europe. It also proposes enabling South Korea to lead its own conventional defense and sustaining support for Israel while Gulf partners take on their own air and missile defense.
What the document actually says
“Transform NATO so that U.S. allies are capable of fielding the great majority of the conventional forces required to deter Russia”
That sentence, in plain words
Change NATO so allies supply most of the troops needed to hold off Russia.
What this is about
NATO is a group of countries that defend each other. The book says Europe should supply most of the troops. The United States would keep its nuclear weapons there. It would send fewer soldiers.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Executive Order 14268 makes allied burden sharing a test applied to arms transfers: the Secretary of Defense must ensure that transferring priority end items to priority partners advances the goal of allies meeting capability targets independently, without sustained support from the United States. That is a criterion for weapons sales. Nothing among the candidates changes American force posture in Europe or shifts the conventional defense of Europe onto European allies, and nothing addresses South Korea leading its own conventional defense or Gulf partners taking on their own air and missile defense. Executive Order 14186 points the other way on the last point, directing an increase in the provision of American missile defense capabilities to allies and partners. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “must”Who acts: President, DODHow: internal managementp. 95 in the PDF
What the document says
“Expand and modernize the U.S. nuclear force so that it has the size, sophistication, and tailoring to deter Russia and China simultaneously.”
The chapter states that Russia maintains and brandishes a large nuclear arsenal while China is undertaking what it calls a historic nuclear breakout, and asks for an arsenal sized and tailored to deter both at once, including new capabilities at the theatre level, so that there is no circumstance in which America is exposed to serious nuclear coercion.
What the document actually says
“Expand and modernize the U.S. nuclear force so that it has the size, sophistication, and tailoring to deter Russia and China simultaneously.”
That sentence, in plain words
Grow the nuclear force. Make it big enough to hold off Russia and China at the same time.
What this is about
The United States keeps nuclear weapons to stop attacks. The book says Russia has many and China is building more. It says America needs more of them too.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing among the candidates concerns the nuclear arsenal. The nearest, a Nuclear Regulatory Commission rule, modernizes that agency's rulemaking procedure, advisory committee practice and security rules for civil nuclear power. The remaining candidates continue national emergencies relating to Russia and to transnational criminal organizations, and neither sizes nor tailors a nuclear force. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “should”Who acts: President, DODHow: internal managementp. 103 in the PDF
What the document says
“Reinstate servicemembers to active duty who were discharged for not receiving the COVID vaccine, restore their appropriate rank, and provide back pay.”
The chapter asks that servicemembers discharged for refusing the COVID vaccine be returned to active duty at their appropriate rank and paid for the intervening period. The vaccine requirement is one of the policies the chapter says has taken a toll on the armed forces.
What the document actually says
“Reinstate servicemembers to active duty who were discharged for not receiving the COVID vaccine, restore their appropriate rank, and provide back pay.”
That sentence, in plain words
Bring back the troops who were let go for refusing the COVID shot. Give them their rank back. Pay them for the time they lost.
What this is about
Troops were told to get a COVID shot. Some said no. They were made to leave. The book says they should get their jobs back. It says they should get their old rank and their missed pay.
The chapter asked that these servicemembers be reinstated at their appropriate rank with back pay. This order directs that reinstatement be made available. Whether rank and back pay follow in each case is a matter of implementation and is not settled by the order's text.
In plain English
The chapter asked that these troops get their jobs back, with their old rank and back pay. This order says they may come back. Whether rank and back pay follow in each case is not set by the order's text.
The document says “should”Who acts: DODHow: internal managementp. 103 in the PDF
What the document says
“those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service”
In a passage on entrance criteria, the chapter says exceptions for individuals predisposed to require medical treatment should be removed, giving those who are HIV positive and those with gender dysphoria as its two examples, and says those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from service. It adds that physical fitness requirements should be based on the occupational field without regard to gender, race, ethnicity or orientation.
What the document actually says
“those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service”
That sentence, in plain words
People who have gender dysphoria should have to leave the armed forces.
What this is about
Gender dysphoria is a medical term. It is used when a person feels their body does not match who they are. The book says people with it should not serve. It says those already serving should be removed.
The chapter went further than reversing the service policy: it asked that those with gender dysphoria be expelled from service. This order directs a change to medical standards; what follows for serving members is not established by the order alone.
In plain English
The chapter asked for more than that. It asked that people with gender dysphoria be put out of the service. This order changes health rules. What that means for those now serving is not set by the order alone.
The document says “should”Who acts: President, DODHow: internal managementp. 104 in the PDF
What the document says
“Reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.”
The chapter says gender dysphoria is incompatible with the demands of military service and that the use of public money for transgender surgeries, or to facilitate abortion for servicemembers, should be ended. This entry and the one on expelling those with gender dysphoria appear in the same run of recommendations and overlap.
What the document actually says
“Reverse policies that allow transgender individuals to serve in the military.”
That sentence, in plain words
Undo the rules that let trans people serve. They should not be allowed in.
What this is about
Transgender people are allowed to serve now. The book says that rule should be undone. It also says public money should not pay for their surgery.
The chapter asked that policies allowing transgender individuals to serve be reversed. This order directs revision of the medical standards that govern service on those grounds.
In plain English
The chapter asked to undo the rule that lets trans people serve. This order tells the armed forces to redo their health rules. Those rules decide who may serve on these grounds.
The document says “should”Who acts: DODHow: internal managementp. 103 in the PDF
What the document says
“Eliminate Marxist indoctrination and divisive critical race theory programs and abolish newly established diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and staff.”
The chapter asks for the abolition of diversity, equity and inclusion offices and their staff across the Department of Defense, and for the elimination of what it describes as Marxist indoctrination and critical race theory programs. It uses those terms without defining them.
What the document actually says
“Eliminate Marxist indoctrination and divisive critical race theory programs and abolish newly established diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and staff.”
That sentence, in plain words
Get rid of these training programs. Close the diversity offices and let their staff go.
What this is about
The military set up offices to work on fairness and diversity. The book says to close them. It says the training they run is harmful. It uses its own words for that training.
Section 4 orders the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Homeland Security for the Coast Guard, to abolish every DEI office and any vestige of one, including sub-offices, programs, elements and initiatives, which is the abolition of offices and staff the chapter asks for. Section 6 bars the Department and the Armed Forces from promoting divisive concepts as defined in Executive Order 13950 and bars hiring anyone to teach them, and section 5 orders an internal review documenting past DEI actions. The fit is not exact in wording or scope: the order never uses the chapter's terms Marxist indoctrination or critical race theory, works instead through the divisive concepts definition carried over from 2020, and adds gender ideology, which this proposal does not raise.
In plain English
The order tells the armed forces to shut down every DEI office. It also bars teaching ideas it calls divisive, and bars hiring people to teach them. The words the chapter used are not in the order. It leans on a 2020 test instead, and adds a topic the chapter did not raise.
Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.
The document says “should”Who acts: DOD, CongressHow: not specifiedp. 102 in the PDF
What the document says
“require completion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery”
The chapter proposes improving recruiters' access to secondary schools and requiring all students in schools that receive federal funding to sit the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, the military entrance examination. It names no instrument for imposing the requirement.
What the document actually says
“require completion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery”
That sentence, in plain words
Make every student sit the test the armed forces use.
What this is about
The military has a test for people who want to join. The book says every student should take it. That would apply at any school that gets federal money.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing among the candidates addresses the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery or recruiter access to schools. The nearest by subject, a Defense Department rule on nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs, eliminates disparate impact liability under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. It changes a civil rights standard for programs the department assists; it does not require any student to sit a test. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “should”Who acts: DODHow: internal managementp. 102 in the PDF
What the document says
“Improve recruiting by suspending the use of the recently introduced MHS Genesis system”
MHS Genesis draws on the private medical records of potential recruits at Military Entrance Processing Stations. The chapter says its use should be suspended because it creates delays and what the chapter calls unwarranted rejections. Recruiting shortfalls are the reason given.
What the document actually says
“Improve recruiting by suspending the use of the recently introduced MHS Genesis system”
That sentence, in plain words
Stop using the new system. It looks up the health records of new recruits.
What this is about
A system pulls up the medical records of people who want to join. The book says it slows things down. It says it turns away people who should be allowed in. It wants the system paused.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing among the candidates concerns MHS Genesis, medical screening at Military Entrance Processing Stations, or access to the private medical records of potential recruits. None of them suspends the system or changes how recruits are screened. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “should”Who acts: PresidentHow: internal managementp. 104 in the PDF
What the document says
“Reduce the number of generals. Rank creep is pervasive.”
The chapter states that the number of senior officers is at an all-time high, above World War II levels, while their battlefield experience is at an all-time low, and says the next President should limit the continued advancement of many of the existing senior officers, whom it says were advanced by prior Administrations for reasons other than warfighting ability.
What the document actually says
“Reduce the number of generals. Rank creep is pervasive.”
That sentence, in plain words
Cut the number of generals. There are far too many now.
What this is about
Generals are the top officers. The book says there are more of them than ever. It says there are more now than in World War II. It wants that number cut.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing among the candidates reduces the number of general and flag officers. The nearest, Public Law 119-80, waives a 60 day notice requirement so that one Army captain can be promoted posthumously and honorarily. It concerns a single case and does not touch the size of the senior officer corps or the advancement of serving officers. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “should”Who acts: DODHow: internal managementp. 104 in the PDF
What the document says
“Audit the course offerings at military academies to remove Marxist indoctrination, eliminate tenure for academic professionals”
The chapter asks for an audit of what is taught at the military academies, the removal of what it calls Marxist indoctrination, the end of tenure for academic staff, and for instructors to be governed by the same rules that apply to other Department of Defense contracting personnel.
What the document actually says
“Audit the course offerings at military academies to remove Marxist indoctrination, eliminate tenure for academic professionals”
That sentence, in plain words
Check what is taught at the military schools. Take out the parts the book objects to. End job-for-life status for the teachers.
What this is about
Officers are trained at special schools. The book wants each course looked at. It wants some parts taken out. It also wants teachers there to lose their job for life.
Section 6(c) directs the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security to review the leadership, curriculum and instructors of the United States Service Academies and other defense academic institutions, and requires those institutions to teach that America and its founding documents remain the most powerful force for good in human history. That is the audit of course offerings the chapter asks for, conducted against the order's own definition of divisive concepts rather than the chapter's terms. The rest of the proposal is untouched: the order says nothing about ending tenure for academic staff and nothing about placing instructors under the rules that govern other Department of Defense contracting personnel. Executive Order 14190, the candidate closest by title, reaches only K-12 schooling and never mentions the academies.
In plain English
The order calls for a review of the armed forces schools. It covers who leads them, what they teach, and who teaches it. That is the audit the chapter wanted, but by the order's own test. The order says nothing about ending tenure for staff.
Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.
The document says “should”Who acts: Congress, SenateHow: legislationp. 103 in the PDF
What the document says
“Codify language to instruct senior military officers (three and four stars) to make certain that they understand their primary duty to be ensuring the readiness of the armed forces, not pursuing a social engineering agenda.”
The chapter asks that this instruction be written into law for three and four star officers, that it be reinforced during Senate confirmation, and that orders motivated by what it calls purely partisan motives be identified as threats to readiness.
What the document actually says
“Codify language to instruct senior military officers (three and four stars) to make certain that they understand their primary duty to be ensuring the readiness of the armed forces, not pursuing a social engineering agenda.”
That sentence, in plain words
Put it in law. Top officers must know their first job is keeping the forces ready to fight.
What this is about
The book wants a law about what top officers must focus on. Their first job would be keeping the forces ready. The book says social causes should not come first.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. The chapter asks for language written into law, and nothing among the candidates is such a statute. None of them instructs three and four star officers about their primary duty, changes what is asked at Senate confirmation, or defines an order as a threat to readiness. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “should”Who acts: DODHow: internal managementp. 104 in the PDF
What the document says
“Restrict the use of social media solely for purposes of recruitment”
The chapter says official military social media should be used only for recruiting, and that service personnel who use an official command channel to engage with civilian critics on social media should be disciplined.
What the document actually says
“Restrict the use of social media solely for purposes of recruitment”
That sentence, in plain words
Use these accounts only to find new recruits. Nothing else.
What this is about
The armed forces run their own social media pages. The book says they should only use them to find recruits. It says staff who argue with critics there should be punished.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Executive Order 14149 bars federal officers and employees from acting, or spending federal resources, in a way that would unconstitutionally abridge an American citizen's speech. It restricts what the government may do to other people's speech, not what the services may say on their own accounts. Nothing among the candidates limits official military social media to recruiting or sets discipline for personnel who argue with critics from a command account. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “should”Who acts: President, DODHow: not specifiedp. 107 in the PDF
What the document says
“This function should be returned to OPM except for military security clearance investigations.”
After the 2015 data breach at the Office of Personnel Management, the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency took over security clearance and suitability investigations for about 95 percent of the federal civilian workforce. The chapter calls that decision wrongheaded, says it grew out of an intention to dismantle OPM, and asks for the function to go back to OPM apart from military clearances.
What the document actually says
“This function should be returned to OPM except for military security clearance investigations.”
That sentence, in plain words
Give this job back to OPM. The military should keep only its own checks.
What this is about
People who handle secrets must be checked first. A defense agency now does that for most civil servants. The book says the personnel agency should do it again.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing among the candidates moves background investigations from the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency back to the Office of Personnel Management. The nearest, the memorandum on strengthening the suitability and fitness of the federal workforce, delegates to the Director of OPM the authority to make final suitability determinations and to direct an agency to remove an employee for post-appointment conduct, and orders a rulemaking to put that in place. It restores an OPM role over the suitability of civilian employees, but it is about who decides, not who investigates, it reaches conduct after appointment rather than pre-appointment background checks, and it says nothing about security clearances. The memorandum on the clearance backlog for Executive Office of the President personnel concerns interim clearances for one set of staff. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “should”Who acts: President, State DepartmentHow: internal managementp. 101 in the PDF
What the document says
“End the tiered review process to eliminate at least 20 days from the FMS process.”
Tiered review is the practice by which the State Department previews prospective arms transfers with Congress before formal notification. The chapter notes it is not written into law, says ending it would remove at least 20 days from the process, and says it should be used only where unanimous congressional support is guaranteed, to prevent what it calls weaponisation by individual Members.
What the document actually says
“End the tiered review process to eliminate at least 20 days from the FMS process.”
That sentence, in plain words
End the early review step. That would cut at least 20 days from arms sales.
What this is about
The United States sells weapons to other countries. Before a sale, Congress gets a quiet early look. The book says this is not required by law. It says dropping it would speed sales up.
The order is aimed at the delay the chapter wants removed. It directs the Secretaries of State and Defense to send Congress a joint letter proposing higher statutory notification thresholds for foreign military sales and direct commercial sales, and directs the Secretary of State to work with Congress to review notification processes so that notified cases are adjudicated in time. It also orders priority partner and priority end-item lists and a single electronic tracking system. What the proposal asks for is not done: tiered review, the informal preview of prospective transfers with Congress, is never mentioned and is not ended, no days are removed from the process by the order itself, and the route is through Congress and statutory thresholds rather than by dropping a State Department practice that is not written into law.
In plain English
The order goes after the same delay in foreign arms sales. It asks Congress to raise the level at which a sale must be reported. It also sets up one tracking system. But the informal step the chapter wanted dropped is never named, and no days are cut by the order itself.
Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.
The document says “should”Who acts: President, CongressHow: not specifiedp. 108 in the PDF
What the document says
“Increase the Army force structure by 50,000 to handle two major regional contingencies simultaneously.”
The chapter states that the Army budget has fallen by roughly 11 percent since 2018 and that the service cannot execute its land dominance mission. It asks for the Army budget to be increased, for the six current modernisation priorities to be accelerated, and for 50,000 more soldiers so that two major regional conflicts can be handled at once.
What the document actually says
“Increase the Army force structure by 50,000 to handle two major regional contingencies simultaneously.”
That sentence, in plain words
Add 50,000 more soldiers to the Army. Then it could fight two big wars at once.
What this is about
The book says the Army has shrunk. It says it could not fight two wars at the same time. It asks for 50,000 more soldiers.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing among the candidates changes Army end strength or the Army budget. Executive Order 14167 assigns the military a role in sealing the borders, which uses forces that already exist, and Executive Order 14269 rebuilds commercial and defense shipbuilding capacity. Neither adds soldiers. End strength of this kind is set in the annual defense authorization, and no such act is among the candidates. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “must”Who acts: President, CongressHow: not specifiedp. 111 in the PDF
What the document says
“Build a fleet of more than 355 ships.”
The chapter asks for a fleet of more than 355 ships, for unmanned systems to be developed and fielded alongside the manned force, and for range and lethality to be the key factors in procurement and sustainment decisions for ships, aircraft and munitions.
What the document actually says
“Build a fleet of more than 355 ships.”
That sentence, in plain words
Build a navy of more than 355 ships.
What this is about
The book says the Navy needs to be bigger. It asks for more than 355 ships. It also wants ships that can run without a crew.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing among the candidates sets naval force structure. The nearest, Proclamation 11055, adjusts tariffs on imported unmanned aircraft systems and their components to build domestic drone production. It touches the unmanned systems the chapter raises alongside the fleet, but it is a trade measure and says nothing about the number of ships or about ship procurement. The other candidates are annual continuations of national emergencies over the movement of vessels in American waters. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “should”Who acts: President, CongressHow: not specifiedp. 114 in the PDF
What the document says
“Increase the Air Force budget by 5 percent annually”
The chapter states that the Air Force is the oldest, smallest and least ready in its history, and that its five-year plan retires 1,463 aircraft while buying 467. It asks for a 5 percent annual increase after inflation, and separately for the elimination of pass-through funding, which it describes as money in the Air Force budget that does not go to the Air Force and which it says exceeds $40 billion a year.
What the document actually says
“Increase the Air Force budget by 5 percent annually”
That sentence, in plain words
Raise the Air Force budget by 5 percent each year.
What this is about
The book says the Air Force is the oldest and smallest it has ever been. It is retiring far more planes than it buys. The book asks for more money each year.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing among the candidates comes close. None of them concerns the Air Force budget, the five year plan for retiring and buying aircraft, or the pass-through funding the chapter wants eliminated. A service topline is set in appropriations, and no appropriations measure among the candidates touches the Air Force. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
The document says “should”Who acts: President, DODHow: internal managementp. 118 in the PDF
What the document says
“Reestablish offensive capabilities to guarantee a favorable balance of forces”
The chapter states that the Biden Administration eliminated almost all offensive deterrence capabilities in space in favor of defensive ones, which it calls the most costly, slowest and most fragile choice. It asks for offensive capabilities to be restored, for space control capability to be expanded to include cis-lunar space, and for less overclassification.
What the document actually says
“Reestablish offensive capabilities to guarantee a favorable balance of forces”
That sentence, in plain words
Build back the power to strike. That keeps the balance in our favor.
What this is about
Satellites in space guide troops and weapons. Today the plan is mostly to defend them. The book says America should also be able to attack. It says that would make an enemy think twice.
The order directs the Secretary of Defense to plan for proliferated space-based interceptors capable of boost-phase intercept and for capabilities to defeat missile attacks before launch and in the boost phase, which places weapons in orbit and reaches past interception of incoming warheads. That overlaps part of what the chapter asks for. The purpose is different and the rest is missing: the architecture ordered is a homeland missile defense shield against ballistic, hypersonic and cruise missiles, not the space control capability against an adversary's space assets that the chapter has in mind, there is nothing about extending space control to cis-lunar space, and nothing about the overclassification the chapter also raises.
In plain English
The order calls for plans to put arms in space. They would stop missiles, even before launch. That is part of what the chapter wanted. But the goal is a shield for the homeland, not control of space itself.
The document says “should”Who acts: DODHow: internal managementp. 116 in the PDF
What the document says
“Eliminate all USMC law enforcement battalions.”
The chapter supports the Force Design 2030 transformation and lists what it involves: eliminating the Marine Corps law enforcement battalions, converting at least one infantry regiment into a littoral regiment, reducing the size of remaining infantry battalions, keeping the divestment of M1 Abrams tanks, cutting most tube artillery batteries, and using the savings for rocket artillery, drones and long-range missiles.
What the document actually says
“Eliminate all USMC law enforcement battalions.”
That sentence, in plain words
Close all of the Marine Corps police units.
What this is about
The Marines are changing what kind of force they are. They want to fight from islands and ships again. So they are giving up tanks and heavy guns. The book backs that plan.
Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing among the candidates carries out Force Design 2030. Proclamation 10990 marks the 250th anniversary of the Marine Corps and is commemorative. The two Department of Government Efficiency orders reach federal civilian staffing across the government and say nothing about law enforcement battalions, littoral regiments, tanks or artillery. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.
Christopher Miller, “Department of Defense,” in Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), pp. 91-132. https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf
This page
“Department of Defense,” Project 2025, chapter 4. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/chapter-4/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).
Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.
What This Page Covers, and What It Leaves Out
Recommendations from the chapter's 'Needed Reforms' lists, which set out its proposals as numbered items, across defense strategy, procurement, research, arms sales, personnel, intelligence and each armed service.
The chapter's assessment of current conditions, its account of recent history including the Afghanistan withdrawal, and the detailed technical procurement items where the proposal is a quantity or a program name rather than a change of policy. Many such items exist and are not all recorded here.
This is the longest chapter indexed so far and its 'Needed Reforms' lists run to well over a hundred numbered items. What is indexed is a selection of the substantive policy changes, not the complete list. Items on force structure, munitions rates and specific weapons programs are largely omitted.
