Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 4 › Proposal

Make denying a Chinese takeover of Taiwan the top defense priority

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 4, p. 93. Written by Christopher Miller.

Make denying a Chinese takeover of Taiwan the top defense priority

The document says “should”Who acts: President, DODHow: internal managementp. 93 in the PDF
What the document says

“Prioritize a denial defense against China. U.S. defense planning should focus on China and, in particular, the effective denial defense of Taiwan.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 93

The chapter states that China is the most significant danger to American security and that the most severe immediate threat is to Taiwan and allies along the first island chain. It asks that all defense efforts focus on prevailing in that scenario, and that conventional force planning be set to defeat a Chinese invasion of Taiwan before resources are allocated to other missions such as fighting a second conflict at the same time.

What the document actually says

“Prioritize a denial defense against China. U.S. defense planning should focus on China and, in particular, the effective denial defense of Taiwan.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 93
That sentence, in plain words

Put China first. Defense plans should aim to stop China taking Taiwan.

What this is about

Taiwan is an island near China. China says it belongs to China. The book says stopping that should come first. It says other war plans should come second.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. The Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act requires the State Department to review its Taiwan Guidelines, the internal rules governing contacts between American and Taiwanese officials, and to report on them to Congress periodically. It concerns diplomatic contact, not force planning, and does nothing to make the denial defense of Taiwan the organizing priority for conventional forces. The other candidates adjust tariffs tied to the opioid supply chain or assign the military a border mission. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 93.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Make denying a Chinese takeover of Taiwan the top defense priority,” Project 2025, chapter 4, p. 93. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch04-denial-defense-of-taiwan/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →