Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 3 › Proposal

Set federal pay by occupation and region against market rates

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 3, p. 77. Written by Donald Devine, Dennis Dean Kirk, Paul Dans.

Set federal pay by occupation and region against market rates

The document says “should (ideally)”Who acts: Congress, OPMHow: legislationp. 77 in the PDF
What the document says

“Ideally, the OPM should establish an initial pay schedule for every occupation and region, monitor turnover rates and applicant-to-position ratios, and adjust pay and recruitment on that basis.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 77

An occupation-and-region pay schedule set by OPM and adjusted against turnover and applicant-to-position ratios. The chapter states that most of this requires legislation, and that in the meantime OPM should advocate for equality of benefits between the public and private sectors.

What the document actually says

“Ideally, the OPM should establish an initial pay schedule for every occupation and region, monitor turnover rates and applicant-to-position ratios, and adjust pay and recruitment on that basis.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 77
That sentence, in plain words

Best of all, OPM would set a starting pay rate for each kind of job and each part of the country. It would watch how many people quit and how many apply. Then it would change pay and hiring to match.

What this is about

The book says federal pay should match what private jobs pay. It wants OPM to set pay for each job and each part of the country. OPM would watch how many people quit and how many apply. Then it would change the pay to match. The book says most of this needs a new law.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing indexed here sets pay schedules by occupation and region or ties pay to turnover and applicant ratios. The chapter itself says most of this needs legislation, and no law of this Congress does it. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 77.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Set federal pay by occupation and region against market rates,” Project 2025, chapter 3, p. 77. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch03-market-based-pay/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →