Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 5 › Proposal

Halt federal funding to NGOs that process or transport migrants

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 5, p. 149. Written by Ken Cuccinelli.

Halt federal funding to NGOs that process or transport migrants

The document says “should”Who acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 149 in the PDF
What the document says

“Congress should halt funds given to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to process and transport illegal aliens into and throughout the United States.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 149

The chapter asks that such funds and infrastructure, including the department's joint processing centers, be redirected to securing the border, detaining people and providing space for immigration court proceedings.

What the document actually says

“Congress should halt funds given to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) to process and transport illegal aliens into and throughout the United States.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 149
That sentence, in plain words

Congress should stop paying charities to move people through the country.

What this is about

Charities help process and move people at the border. Some get federal money for it. The book says that money should stop. It should go to the border instead.

What has happened
Partly matches

Protecting the American People Against Invasion

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8443

Section 19 directs the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to review and, if appropriate, audit all contracts, grants and other agreements providing federal funding to non-governmental organizations supporting or providing services, directly or indirectly, to removable or illegal aliens, to pause distribution of all further funds under those agreements pending the review, to terminate any found to violate law or to be sources of waste, fraud or abuse, to prohibit future ones, to coordinate with the Office of Management and Budget so that no such funding appears in appropriations requests, and to start clawback where appropriate. The chapter asks Congress to halt the funds. This is executive action inside existing appropriations, and the terminations turn on a finding about a particular agreement rather than on the processing or transport of aliens as such. The order also does not redirect the money to border security, detention or space for immigration court proceedings, and it does not mention the department's joint processing centers.

In plain English

The order tells two cabinet heads to review all federal grants to groups that help aliens here illegally. Money stops during the review. Deals found to break the law end, and new ones are barred. But the book asked Congress to cut the funds. This is action inside money already granted, and each cut turns on one deal. The funds are not moved to border work.

What cites those orders

7 agency rules

Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 149.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Halt federal funding to NGOs that process or transport migrants,” Project 2025, chapter 5, p. 149. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch05-halt-ngo-funding/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →