Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 7 › Proposal

Order a 60-day review of all covert action findings

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 7, p. 211. Written by Dustin J. Carmack.

Order a 60-day review of all covert action findings

The document says “should”Who acts: President, NSCHow: internal managementp. 211 in the PDF
What the document says

“the President should task the NSC’s Senior”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 211

The full passage asks that immediately after inauguration the President task the National Security Council's Senior Director for Intelligence Programs with a 60-day review of current covert action findings and their effectiveness, evaluating new covert actions that may be needed, conducted independently of the agencies responsible. The chapter says the review should identify which agency is best equipped for each objective, and that careful thought should be given to how effectiveness is measured, to guard against covert action being used with little scrutiny in ways inconsistent with overt policy.

What the document actually says

“the President should task the NSC’s Senior”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 211
That sentence, in plain words

The president should give this job to a senior White House official.

What this is about

Covert action is secret work approved by the president. The book says all of it should be reviewed. The review would take 60 days. It would be done by people outside the agencies involved.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing indexed here comes close. No candidate concerns covert action, and no executive order, memorandum, notice or determination indexed on this site mentions covert action findings. A review of the kind the chapter asks for would be run inside the National Security Council and would not normally be published, so its absence from these records is not evidence either way. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 211.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Order a 60-day review of all covert action findings,” Project 2025, chapter 7, p. 211. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch07-covert-action-review/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →