Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 7 › Proposal

Consider using military capabilities for covert action

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 7, p. 210. Written by Dustin J. Carmack.

Consider using military capabilities for covert action

The document says “should consider”Who acts: PresidentHow: not specifiedp. 210 in the PDF
What the document says

“the President should consider whether DOD’s complete set of capabilities should be used to support potential covert actions.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 210

The chapter notes that certain Defense Department clandestine capabilities under Title 10 can generally be used outside a combat theatre only if they count as traditional military activities, which in practice means many capabilities in the space and cyber domains can be used only after armed conflict begins. It raises using them for covert action as something to consider rather than as a recommendation.

What the document actually says

“the President should consider whether DOD’s complete set of capabilities should be used to support potential covert actions.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 210
That sentence, in plain words

The military has secret tools of its own. The president should think about using them for secret work.

What this is about

The military has secret abilities. Rules limit when it can use them. Usually a war must have started. The book says the president should think about changing that.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. The chapter raises this as something for the President to consider rather than as a recommendation, so there is no definite proposal to answer. Nothing indexed here addresses the use of Defense Department clandestine capabilities under Title 10 to support covert action. The nearest candidates are two notices continuing an emergency over foreign advancement in sensitive technologies, which restrict investment and do not touch military authorities. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 210.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Consider using military capabilities for covert action,” Project 2025, chapter 7, p. 210. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch07-dod-capabilities-for-covert-action/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →