Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 7 › Proposal

Retain Section 702 surveillance as an essential tool

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 7, p. 215. Written by Dustin J. Carmack.

Retain Section 702 surveillance as an essential tool

The document says “should”Who acts: Congress, PresidentHow: legislationp. 215 in the PDF
What the document says

“Section 702 should be understood as an essential tool in the fight against terrorism, malicious cyber actors, and Chinese espionage.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 215

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows the targeting of non-US persons abroad when their communications pass through the United States. The chapter says it provides much of the intelligence in the President's Daily Brief and that an independent oversight board found it was not abused, while asking Congress to review that board's report to determine whether reforms are needed. It separately criticizes the handling of the Carter Page applications and asks for reforms against partisan abuse.

What the document actually says

“Section 702 should be understood as an essential tool in the fight against terrorism, malicious cyber actors, and Chinese espionage.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 215
That sentence, in plain words

This power should be kept. It helps fight terror, hackers and Chinese spying.

What this is about

One law lets spies watch people abroad. Some of those messages pass through America. The book says that power should be kept. It also says past abuses should be fixed.

What has happened
Partly matches

To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes

2026-04-30 · 140 Stat. 811

Signed April 30, 2026, the law moves the repeal date of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which contains Section 702, from April 30, 2026 to June 12, 2026, so the authority stayed in force rather than lapsing. Public Law 119-84 of April 18, 2026 had set the April 30 date in the same way. Congress kept the tool, which is what the chapter asks. The fit breaks down in that both laws are extensions of weeks that change only dates and cross references: neither settles the authority for the long term, and neither addresses the oversight board report the chapter asks Congress to review or the reforms against partisan abuse of the surveillance statute that the chapter raises alongside.

In plain English

A law signed April 30, 2026 moves the end date of the surveillance title from April 30, 2026 to June 12, 2026. The power stayed in force rather than lapsing, which is what the chapter wants. But this is a stretch of weeks that changes only dates. It settles nothing for the long term and takes up none of the reforms the chapter raises.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 215.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Retain Section 702 surveillance as an essential tool,” Project 2025, chapter 7, p. 215. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch07-retain-section-702/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →