Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 7 › Proposal

Require senior intelligence officers to accept reassignment every two years

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 7, p. 211. Written by Dustin J. Carmack.

Require senior intelligence officers to accept reassignment every two years

The document says “should”Who acts: DNI, CIAHow: internal managementp. 211 in the PDF
What the document says

“Senior officers should be required to sign mobility agreements that allow ODNI and CIA leadership to move them within the IC every two years if necessary.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 211

The chapter says some long-serving generalist officers no longer perform at a high level, are management driven and limit junior officers' prospects. It asks that agencies work with the Office of Personnel Management on voluntary separation buyouts to reduce what it calls bloat and underperforming cadre.

What the document actually says

“Senior officers should be required to sign mobility agreements that allow ODNI and CIA leadership to move them within the IC every two years if necessary.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 211
That sentence, in plain words

Senior officers should sign a deal. It would let leaders move them to a new post every two years.

What this is about

Senior officers often stay in one post for years. The book says leaders should be able to move them. It would happen as often as every two years.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. The Office of Personnel Management rule widens agency authority to waive the normal payment limits on recruitment and relocation incentives and lets agencies set shorter service periods. It makes paying for a move easier, but the incentives are voluntary and individual. It does not require senior intelligence officers to sign mobility agreements, gives leadership at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the CIA no power to reassign them every two years, and does not address the separation buyouts the chapter asks for. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 211.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Require senior intelligence officers to accept reassignment every two years,” Project 2025, chapter 7, p. 211. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch07-senior-officer-mobility/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →