Read theMandate

Project 2025Chapter 9 › Proposal

Cut USAID back to its 2019 budget level

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 9, p. 254. Written by Max Primorac.

Cut USAID back to its 2019 budget level

The document says “shouldWho acts: President, CongressHow: legislationp. 254 in the PDF
What the document says

“The next conservative Administration should scale back USAID’s global footprint by, at a minimum, returning to the agency’s 2019 pre–COVID-19 pandemic budget level.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 254

The chapter asks for the agency's global footprint to be scaled back to at least its 2019 level, for its programs and structures to be, in its word, deradicalised, and for deep cuts to the international affairs 150 Account while giving the agency more flexibility over how it spends what remains.

What the document actually says

“The next conservative Administration should scale back USAID’s global footprint by, at a minimum, returning to the agency’s 2019 pre–COVID-19 pandemic budget level.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 254
That sentence, in plain words

Make this agency smaller. Take its budget back to what it was in 2019.

What this is about

This agency sends aid to poor countries. Its budget grew during the pandemic. The book says it should go back to the 2019 level.

What has happened
Partly matches

Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8619

Addresses the chapter's subject of scaling the agency back, by a different route. The chapter asked for a return to at least the 2019 budget level and deep cuts to the international affairs account, which requires Congress; this order pauses and reviews existing assistance under executive authority.

Share this page

How to read this page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, and we check the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →