Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 13 › Proposal

Eliminate several research office programs including the risk information system

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 13, p. 437. Written by Mandy M. Gunasekara.

Eliminate several research office programs including the risk information system

The document says “should”Who acts: EPA, CongressHow: legislationp. 437 in the PDF
What the document says

“Several ORD offices and programs, many of which constitute unaccountable efforts to use scientific determinations to drive regulatory, enforcement, and legal decisions, should be eliminated.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 437

The chapter gives the Integrated Risk Information System as its example, saying it has operated since the 1980s without ever being authorized by Congress, often sets safe levels based on what it calls questionable science and below background levels, and results in billions in economic costs.

What the document actually says

“Several ORD offices and programs, many of which constitute unaccountable efforts to use scientific determinations to drive regulatory, enforcement, and legal decisions, should be eliminated.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 437
That sentence, in plain words

Some research offices here should be closed. Their science drives rules and cases.

What this is about

One office studies how harmful chemicals are. Its findings shape rules and lawsuits. The book says Congress never approved it. It wants it closed.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. The consolidated appropriations act for fiscal year 2026, enacted January 23, 2026, is the only candidate that acts on EPA's research money, and it funds the work: $744,195,000 for EPA science and technology and $3,114,671,000 for programs and management. It eliminates no research office program. Nothing indexed abolishes the Integrated Risk Information System or any other program in the Office of Research and Development. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 437.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Eliminate several research office programs including the risk information system,” Project 2025, chapter 13, p. 437. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch13-eliminate-research-programs/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →