Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 14 › Proposal

Fund studies on the negative effects of gender transition care

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 14, p. 462. Written by Roger Severino.

Fund studies on the negative effects of gender transition care

The document says “should”Who acts: NIHHow: internal managementp. 462 in the PDF
What the document says

“it should fund studies into the short-term and long-term negative effects of crosssex interventions”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462

The chapter names affirmation, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries, and asks for study of the likelihood of desistence if young people are given counseling that does not include medical or social interventions. It says the agency has been at the forefront of pushing what it calls junk gender science.

What the document actually says

“it should fund studies into the short-term and long-term negative effects of crosssex interventions”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462
That sentence, in plain words

The NIH should pay for studies on the harms of this care. Both short term and long term.

What this is about

Some young people get medical care to change how their body looks. The book wants studies into harm from that care. It also wants studies of counseling instead.

What has happened
Partly matches

Protecting Children From Chemical and Surgical Mutilation

2025-01-28 · 90 FR 8771

Section 3 of EO 14187 orders HHS to publish, within 90 days, a review of the existing literature on best practices for promoting the health of children who assert gender dysphoria, and to use all available methods to improve the quality of data guiding their care. That reaches the study half of the proposal by a different route: it commissions a literature review and better data rather than funding studies of the short and long term negative effects of the interventions, and it does not mention studying desistance among young people given counseling without medical or social intervention.

In plain English

The order tells the health agency to review what has been written on care for these children. It also tells the agency to improve its data. The chapter asked for new studies of harm from the treatments. A review of old work is not the same thing.

What cites those orders

4 agency rules

Each of these names the order above in its own summary, preamble or filing. That is a fact about the document, not a finding that it carries out this proposal: it is one step further away than the order is, and what it does about the proposal is a reading nobody has made here.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 462.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Fund studies on the negative effects of gender transition care,” Project 2025, chapter 14, p. 462. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch14-fund-studies-on-gender-interventions/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →