Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 14

Department of Health and Human Services

Chapter 14 · pp. 449–502 · Roger Severino

What this chapter is about

This chapter is about health and welfare. Its first idea is that abortion is not health care. Much of the rest follows from that. It also wants the CDC split in two. It wants limits on health advice from the government. And it wants changes to Medicare and Medicaid.

18 proposals indexed from this chapter.

The document says “mustWho acts: HHSHow: internal managementp. 450 in the PDF
What the document says

“Abortion and euthanasia are not health care.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 450

The chapter says the Secretary must ensure that all department programs and activities are rooted in respect for innocent human life from day one until natural death, and frames this as the first of five goals for the department. Much of the rest of the chapter follows from it.

What the document actually says

“Abortion and euthanasia are not health care.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 450
That sentence, in plain words

The book says abortion and euthanasia are not health care.

What this is about

This is the book's starting point for this chapter. It says abortion and ending life should not count as health care. Many of its other ideas follow from that.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 452 in the PDF
What the document says

“The CDC should be split into two separate entities housing its two distinct functions.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 452

The chapter proposes a national epidemiological agency responsible only for publishing data, required by law to publish everything gathered from states and other sources, and a separate public health agency with what it calls a severely confined ability to make policy recommendations, with a firewall between them.

What the document actually says

“The CDC should be split into two separate entities housing its two distinct functions.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 452
That sentence, in plain words

The CDC does two different jobs. It should be split into two agencies.

What this is about

The CDC gathers data on disease. It also gives health advice. The book says one body should not do both. It wants two separate agencies.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “mustWho acts: Congress, HHSHow: legislationp. 454 in the PDF
What the document says

“By statute or regulation, CDC guidance must be prohibited from taking on a prescriptive character.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 454

The chapter gives as its example that officials should never again be able to say in an official capacity that school children should be masked or vaccinated, and says such decisions should be left to parents and medical providers. It argues that when the agency says what people should do it readily becomes a must backed by severe punishments including criminal penalties, and that the agency should report on risks and effectiveness dispassionately and leave the policy calls to politically accountable parties.

What the document actually says

“By statute or regulation, CDC guidance must be prohibited from taking on a prescriptive character.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 454
That sentence, in plain words

The CDC gives advice. A law should stop that advice telling people what to do.

What this is about

The CDC tells people what it thinks they should do. The book says that advice becomes an order. It says the CDC should give facts only.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: CDCHow: internal managementp. 456 in the PDF
What the document says

“The CDC should immediately end its collection of data on gender identity”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 456

The chapter states that collecting the data legitimizes what it calls the unscientific notion that men can become women and vice versa, and encourages what it describes as ever-multiplying subjective identities.

What the document actually says

“The CDC should immediately end its collection of data on gender identity”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 456
That sentence, in plain words

The CDC should stop collecting this data right away.

What this is about

The CDC asks people about gender identity in surveys. The book says that should stop at once.

What has happened
Partly matches

Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government

2025-01-20 · 90 FR 8615

Addresses the chapter's subject. The chapter asked specifically that the Centers for Disease Control end its collection of gender identity data; this order sets a government-wide policy on recognizing two sexes and on federal funds rather than naming that data collection.

The document says “shouldWho acts: FDAHow: regulationp. 458 in the PDF
What the document says

“As an interim step, the FDA should immediately restore the REMS by removing the in-person dispensing requirement to eliminate dangerous tele-abortion and abortion-by-mail distribution.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 458

The Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy formerly required mifepristone to be dispensed in person. The chapter calls this an interim step, and asks separately for reporting of complications through the adverse event system and for transparency about inspections of the manufacturers.

What the document actually says

“As an interim step, the FDA should immediately restore the REMS by removing the in-person dispensing requirement to eliminate dangerous tele-abortion and abortion-by-mail distribution.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 458
That sentence, in plain words

For now, the FDA should bring back the rule. It required the pill to be handed over in person.

What this is about

One pill is used to end a pregnancy. It used to be handed over in person. Now it can be sent by mail. The book says the old rule should come back.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: Congress, HHSHow: legislationp. 471 in the PDF
What the document says

“Policymakers should end taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood and all other abortion providers”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 471

The chapter says the funding should be redirected to health centers that provide what it calls real health care for women, that most such federal funding comes through Medicaid, and asks Congress to pass the Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act. It also asks the agency to resolve pending waivers from Idaho, South Carolina and Tennessee seeking to bar abortion providers from state Medicaid programs.

What the document actually says

“Policymakers should end taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood and all other abortion providers”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 471
That sentence, in plain words

Stop tax money going to Planned Parenthood. Stop it to other abortion clinics too.

What this is about

Planned Parenthood runs health clinics. Some of them do abortions. It gets federal money for other care. The book says that money should stop.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: HHS, CMSHow: regulationp. 472 in the PDF
What the document says

“HHS/CMS should withdraw appropriated funding, up to and including 10 percent of Medicaid funds, from states that require abortion insurance coverage.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 472

The chapter asks that the Justice Department commit to litigating the defense of those funding decisions promptly to the Supreme Court, in order to maximize the department's ability to withdraw funds from entities it says violate the Weldon Amendment, which bars discrimination against health entities that decline to provide abortion.

What the document actually says

“HHS/CMS should withdraw appropriated funding, up to and including 10 percent of Medicaid funds, from states that require abortion insurance coverage.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 472
That sentence, in plain words

Some states make plans cover abortion. Take back some of their health money.

What this is about

Medicaid pays for health care for poor people. Some states make insurance cover abortion. The book says those states should lose part of that money.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: HHS, NIH, CongressHow: legislationp. 460 in the PDF
What the document says

“Research using human embryonic stem cells also involves the destruction of human life and should not be subsidized with taxpayer dollars.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 460

The chapter says research using fetal tissue from elective abortions is immoral and obsolete, asks that the ethics advisory committee overseeing it be restored and that Congress prohibit such research altogether, and that intramural projects using tissue from aborted children end along with the human embryonic stem cell registry. It separately asks that three-parent embryo creation and human cloning research be banned.

What the document actually says

“Research using human embryonic stem cells also involves the destruction of human life and should not be subsidized with taxpayer dollars.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 460
That sentence, in plain words

This research destroys human life. Taxpayers should not pay for it.

What this is about

Some research uses cells from very early embryos. Getting them destroys the embryo. The book says public money should not pay for it.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: HHS, CongressHow: legislationp. 452 in the PDF
What the document says

“Regulators should have a long “cooling off period” on their contracts (15 years would not be too long)”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 452

The chapter says the revolving door between government and pharmaceutical companies should be shut and locked, that executives should likewise be restricted from moving into regulatory agencies, and that regulators at the health agencies should be entirely free from private biopharmaceutical funding, which it calls agency capture and a thin veneer for corporatism. It cites a finding that more than two-thirds of FDA reviewers later joined companies whose products they had reviewed.

What the document actually says

“Regulators should have a long “cooling off period” on their contracts (15 years would not be too long)”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 452
That sentence, in plain words

Regulators should have to wait a long time. Fifteen years would not be too long.

What this is about

People who regulate drug firms often go to work for them later. The book says that is a problem. It says they should have to wait many years.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: Congress, HHSHow: legislationp. 462 in the PDF
What the document says

“Term limits should be imposed on top career leaders at the NIH, and Congress should consider block granting NIH’s grants budget to states”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462

The chapter says research funding should not be controlled by what it calls a small group of highly paid and unaccountable insiders, many of whom stay in power for decades, and that the monopoly on directing research should be broken. It notes that states could partner to co-fund larger projects and that state funding would not preclude more modest federal funding.

What the document actually says

“Term limits should be imposed on top career leaders at the NIH, and Congress should consider block granting NIH’s grants budget to states”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462
That sentence, in plain words

Limit how long the top people at NIH can serve. Congress could also send the research money to states.

What this is about

The NIH funds most medical research. The same people run it for decades. The book says there should be time limits. It says states could hand out the money instead.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: NIHHow: internal managementp. 462 in the PDF
What the document says

“the NIH Office of Equity,”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462

The full passage asks that the Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion be abolished, and that the practice of refusing to sponsor scientific conferences without a certain number of women panelists be ended, which the chapter says violates federal civil rights law against sex discrimination.

What the document actually says

“the NIH Office of Equity,”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462
That sentence, in plain words

One office at the NIH works on fairness and diversity.

What this is about

The NIH has an office for fairness and diversity. The book says it pushes unlawful rules. It wants the office closed.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: NIHHow: internal managementp. 462 in the PDF
What the document says

“it should fund studies into the short-term and long-term negative effects of crosssex interventions”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462

The chapter names affirmation, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries, and asks for study of the likelihood of desistence if young people are given counseling that does not include medical or social interventions. It says the agency has been at the forefront of pushing what it calls junk gender science.

What the document actually says

“it should fund studies into the short-term and long-term negative effects of crosssex interventions”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462
That sentence, in plain words

The NIH should pay for studies on the harms of this care. Both short term and long term.

What this is about

Some young people get medical care to change how their body looks. The book wants studies into harm from that care. It also wants studies of counseling instead.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: CMS, StatesHow: regulationp. 468 in the PDF
What the document says

“Add work requirements and match Medicaid benefits to beneficiary needs.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 468

The chapter proposes that states be allowed to run what it calls a personal option letting families use Medicaid dollars to buy coverage outside the program, that private insurance options and health savings account style arrangements be allowed, that benefit mandates exceeding the private market be removed for able-bodied recipients, and that eligibility determinations and asset tests be strengthened.

What the document actually says

“Add work requirements and match Medicaid benefits to beneficiary needs.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 468
That sentence, in plain words

Make some people work to get Medicaid. Match what they get to what they need.

What this is about

Medicaid pays for health care for poor people. The book says some should have to work to get it. It also wants benefits matched to need.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: CongressHow: legislationp. 465 in the PDF
What the document says

“This “negotiation” program should be repealed”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 465

The program, created by the Inflation Reduction Act, lets Medicare set prices for selected drugs. The chapter puts the word negotiation in quotation marks, and says that if the act is not repealed an Administration required to implement it must do so prudently, minimizing the harmful effects of the law's policies.

What the document actually says

“This “negotiation” program should be repealed”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 465
That sentence, in plain words

This program should be repealed. The book puts the word negotiation in quote marks.

What this is about

Medicare can now bargain over some drug prices. The book says that is not real bargaining. It wants the program ended.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: HHS, CDCHow: regulationp. 455 in the PDF
What the document says

“HHS should use every available tool, including the cutting of funds, to ensure that every state reports exactly how many abortions take place within its borders”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 455

The chapter asks that reports cover gestational age, reason, the mother's state of residence and method, separated by category, and that complications and every instance of a child born alive after an abortion be monitored and reported. It says abortion should be defined only as procedures that intentionally end an unborn child's life, and that miscarriage management and standard ectopic pregnancy treatment should never be conflated with abortion.

What the document actually says

“HHS should use every available tool, including the cutting of funds, to ensure that every state reports exactly how many abortions take place within its borders”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 455
That sentence, in plain words

Make every state report its abortion numbers. Cut their funding if they will not.

What this is about

States are not all required to report abortions. The book says every state should have to. It says money should be cut off if they refuse.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: HHSHow: internal managementp. 451 in the PDF
What the document says

“These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 451

The chapter says current policies focus on LGBTQ+ equity, subsidizing single motherhood, disincentivizing work and penalizing marriage. It asks that the department prioritize married father engagement in its messaging, health and welfare policies, and says that in reproductive technology policy the desires of adults should never be placed over the right of children to be raised by the biological parents who conceive them.

What the document actually says

“These policies should be repealed and replaced by policies that support the formation of stable, married, nuclear families.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 451
That sentence, in plain words

These rules should be repealed. New ones should back married families instead.

What this is about

The book says current rules help single parents. It says they discourage marriage. It wants rules that support married couples raising children.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “needs toWho acts: HHSHow: regulationp. 464 in the PDF
What the document says

“HHS needs to restore and enhance conscience protection regulations”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 464

The chapter says the regulations should allow medical practitioners to take part in federal health care programs without being compelled to provide sex changes or similar services.

What the document actually says

“HHS needs to restore and enhance conscience protection regulations”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 464
That sentence, in plain words

Bring back the rules that protect conscience. Make them stronger.

What this is about

Some doctors object to certain treatments on moral grounds. Rules once let them opt out. The book wants those rules back.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

The document says “shouldWho acts: CMSHow: regulationp. 464 in the PDF
What the document says

“regulations should advance site neutrality by eliminating the inpatient-only list”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 464

The chapter says Medicare generally pays more for procedures performed as hospital inpatient care and less for the same procedure done as an outpatient, and that payment should be the same whether the service is delivered in a physician's office, a clinic or a hospital. It says this would level the playing field and remove financial disabilities for practitioners competing with hospital systems.

What the document actually says

“regulations should advance site neutrality by eliminating the inpatient-only list”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 464
That sentence, in plain words

Pay the same wherever care happens. Start by scrapping the inpatient-only list.

What this is about

The same treatment can cost more in a hospital. Medicare pays more there too. The book says the price should be the same everywhere.

No action is recorded against this proposal. That is not evidence that none has been taken. See what the tracker does not yet cover.

Share this page

What is indexed here, and what is not

Recommendations across the chapter's five stated goals, the Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health, Medicare, Medicaid, insurance markets, abortion funding and bioethics.

The chapter's detailed treatment of clinical laboratory regulation, drug shortages and generic competition, the Administration for Children and Families, Head Start, and many technical payment and waiver items.

This is the longest chapter in the book and contains far more recommendations than are indexed here. Its proposals concerning abortion appear across many of its sections, and are recorded where they are made rather than gathered into one entry.