Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 14 › Proposal

Restore in-person dispensing requirements for the abortion pill

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 14, p. 458. Written by Roger Severino.

Restore in-person dispensing requirements for the abortion pill

The document says “should”Who acts: FDAHow: regulationp. 458 in the PDF
What the document says

“As an interim step, the FDA should immediately restore the REMS by removing the in-person dispensing requirement to eliminate dangerous tele-abortion and abortion-by-mail distribution.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 458

The Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy formerly required mifepristone to be dispensed in person. The chapter calls this an interim step, and asks separately for reporting of complications through the adverse event system and for transparency about inspections of the manufacturers.

What the document actually says

“As an interim step, the FDA should immediately restore the REMS by removing the in-person dispensing requirement to eliminate dangerous tele-abortion and abortion-by-mail distribution.”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 458
That sentence, in plain words

For now, the FDA should bring back the rule. It required the pill to be handed over in person.

What this is about

One pill is used to end a pregnancy. It used to be handed over in person. Now it can be sent by mail. The book says the old rule should come back.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing indexed restores the in-person dispensing requirement in the mifepristone risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, and no FDA action on that strategy appears in the record indexed here. The nearest candidate by wording, memo-2025-01907, tells federal employees to return to in-person work, which matched on the phrase alone. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 458.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Restore in-person dispensing requirements for the abortion pill,” Project 2025, chapter 14, p. 458. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch14-restore-abortion-pill-restrictions/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →