Read theMandate

Project 2025 › Chapter 14 › Proposal

Impose term limits at NIH and consider block granting its research budget

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, chapter 14, p. 462. Written by Roger Severino.

Impose term limits at NIH and consider block granting its research budget

The document says “should”Who acts: Congress, HHSHow: legislationp. 462 in the PDF
What the document says

“Term limits should be imposed on top career leaders at the NIH, and Congress should consider block granting NIH’s grants budget to states”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462

The chapter says research funding should not be controlled by what it calls a small group of highly paid and unaccountable insiders, many of whom stay in power for decades, and that the monopoly on directing research should be broken. It notes that states could partner to co-fund larger projects and that state funding would not preclude more modest federal funding.

What the document actually says

“Term limits should be imposed on top career leaders at the NIH, and Congress should consider block granting NIH’s grants budget to states”

Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 462
That sentence, in plain words

Limit how long the top people at NIH can serve. Congress could also send the research money to states.

What this is about

The NIH funds most medical research. The same people run it for decades. The book says there should be time limits. It says states could hand out the money instead.

Read against the documents indexed here on August 26, 2026, and nothing was found that answers this. Nothing indexed imposes term limits on NIH career leadership or block grants any part of the NIH grants budget to the states. None of the candidates concerns NIH: two are law firm cases, and the three laws cover veterans' life insurance, an energy conservation disapproval and the small business research programs. That is a record of a search, not a finding that nothing has happened: an act this site does not hold, or one that answers the proposal in words unlike its own, would not be caught by it.

Share this page
How to cite this
  1. The document itself

    Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, edited by Paul Dans and Steven Groves (The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 462.
    https://static.heritage.org/project2025/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

  2. This page

    “Impose term limits at NIH and consider block granting its research budget,” Project 2025, chapter 14, p. 462. Read the Mandate, https://readthemandate.org/project-2025/proposal/ch14-nih-term-limits-and-block-grants/ (retrieved October 7, 2026).

Cite the document when the claim is about what the document says. Cite this page when the indexing, the wording or the record of what has happened is what is being relied on.

How to Read This Page

The quotation is the document's own words, exactly as printed, checked against the page number against the book itself before publishing. The paragraph underneath is our summary, not the document's words. So is the plain English version, which is why it sits beside the quotation rather than replacing it.

All proposals in this chapter →